Accounting for selection and correlation in the analysis of two-stage genome-wide association studies
The problem of selection bias has long been recognized in the analysis of two-stage trials, where promising candidates are selected in stage 1 for confirmatory analysis in stage 2. To efficiently correct for bias, uniformly minimum variance conditionally unbiased estimators (UMVCUEs) have been propo...
Main Authors: | Robertson, David S., Prevost, A. Toby, Bowden, Jack |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5031943/ |
Similar Items
-
Correcting for selection bias in two-stage trials with multiple correlated outcomes: application to seamless phase ii/iii clinical trials
by: Robertson, David, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Correcting for bias in the selection and validation of informative diagnostic tests
by: Robertson, David S, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Unbiased estimation in seamless phase II/III trials with unequal treatment effect variances and hypothesis‐driven selection rules
by: Robertson, David S., et al.
Published: (2016) -
Two-Stage Two-Locus Models in Genome-Wide Association
by: Evans, David M, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Designing a preliminary adaptive study to inform a biomarker trial in Psoriasis
by: Prevost, Andrew T, et al.
Published: (2011)