Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes
Two-stage designs are commonly used for Phase II trials. Optimal two-stage designs have the lowest expected sample size for a specific treatment effect, for example, the null value, but can perform poorly if the true treatment effect differs. Here we introduce a design for continuous treatment respo...
Main Authors: | Wason, James M. S., Mander, Adrian P. |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2012
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662082/ |
Similar Items
-
The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
by: Wason, James MS, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Optimal multistage designs for randomised clinical trials with continuous outcomes
by: Wason, James MS, et al.
Published: (2012) -
A review and re-interpretation of a group-sequential approach to sample size re-estimation in two-stage trials
by: Bowden, J, et al.
Published: (2014) -
An adaptive trial design for updating the threshold of a continuous biomarker
by: Spencer, Amy, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Using continuous data on tumour measurements to improve inference in phase II cancer studies
by: Wason, James, et al.
Published: (2013)