Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes

Two-stage designs are commonly used for Phase II trials. Optimal two-stage designs have the lowest expected sample size for a specific treatment effect, for example, the null value, but can perform poorly if the true treatment effect differs. Here we introduce a design for continuous treatment respo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wason, James M. S., Mander, Adrian P.
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2012
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662082/
id pubmed-3662082
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-36620822013-05-28 Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes Wason, James M. S. Mander, Adrian P. Research Article Two-stage designs are commonly used for Phase II trials. Optimal two-stage designs have the lowest expected sample size for a specific treatment effect, for example, the null value, but can perform poorly if the true treatment effect differs. Here we introduce a design for continuous treatment responses that minimizes the maximum expected sample size across all possible treatment effects. The proposed design performs well for a wider range of treatment effects and so is useful for Phase II trials. We compare the design to a previously used optimal design and show it has superior expected sample size properties. Taylor & Francis 2012-05-31 2012-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3662082/ /pubmed/22651118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2010.528104 Text en Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Wason, James M. S.
Mander, Adrian P.
spellingShingle Wason, James M. S.
Mander, Adrian P.
Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes
author_facet Wason, James M. S.
Mander, Adrian P.
author_sort Wason, James M. S.
title Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes
title_short Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes
title_full Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes
title_fullStr Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Minimizing the Maximum Expected Sample Size in Two-Stage Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes
title_sort minimizing the maximum expected sample size in two-stage phase ii clinical trials with continuous outcomes
description Two-stage designs are commonly used for Phase II trials. Optimal two-stage designs have the lowest expected sample size for a specific treatment effect, for example, the null value, but can perform poorly if the true treatment effect differs. Here we introduce a design for continuous treatment responses that minimizes the maximum expected sample size across all possible treatment effects. The proposed design performs well for a wider range of treatment effects and so is useful for Phase II trials. We compare the design to a previously used optimal design and show it has superior expected sample size properties.
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2012
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662082/
_version_ 1611980445604380672