The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected

Traditionally, phase II cancer trials test a binary endpoint formed from a dichotomisation of the continuous change in tumour size. Directly testing the continuous endpoint provides considerable gains in power, although also results in several statistical issues. One such issue is when complete resp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wason, James MS, Mander, Adrian P
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2015
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668774/
id pubmed-4668774
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-46687742015-12-10 The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected Wason, James MS Mander, Adrian P Articles Traditionally, phase II cancer trials test a binary endpoint formed from a dichotomisation of the continuous change in tumour size. Directly testing the continuous endpoint provides considerable gains in power, although also results in several statistical issues. One such issue is when complete responses, i.e. complete tumour removal, are observed in multiple patients; this is a problem when normality is assumed. Using simulated data and a recently published phase II trial, we investigate how the choice of test affects the operating characteristics of the trial. We propose using parametric tests based on the censored normal distribution, comparing them to the t-test and Wilcoxon non-parametric test. The censored normal distribution fits the real dataset well, but simulations indicate its type-I error rate is inflated, and its power is only slightly higher than the t-test. The Wilcoxon test has deflated type I error. For two-arm designs, the differences are much smaller. We conclude that the t-test is suitable for use when complete responses are present, although positively skewed data can result in the non-parametric test having higher power. SAGE Publications 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4668774/ /pubmed/22179821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280211432192 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Wason, James MS
Mander, Adrian P
spellingShingle Wason, James MS
Mander, Adrian P
The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
author_facet Wason, James MS
Mander, Adrian P
author_sort Wason, James MS
title The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
title_short The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
title_full The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
title_fullStr The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
title_full_unstemmed The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
title_sort choice of test in phase ii cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected
description Traditionally, phase II cancer trials test a binary endpoint formed from a dichotomisation of the continuous change in tumour size. Directly testing the continuous endpoint provides considerable gains in power, although also results in several statistical issues. One such issue is when complete responses, i.e. complete tumour removal, are observed in multiple patients; this is a problem when normality is assumed. Using simulated data and a recently published phase II trial, we investigate how the choice of test affects the operating characteristics of the trial. We propose using parametric tests based on the censored normal distribution, comparing them to the t-test and Wilcoxon non-parametric test. The censored normal distribution fits the real dataset well, but simulations indicate its type-I error rate is inflated, and its power is only slightly higher than the t-test. The Wilcoxon test has deflated type I error. For two-arm designs, the differences are much smaller. We conclude that the t-test is suitable for use when complete responses are present, although positively skewed data can result in the non-parametric test having higher power.
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2015
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668774/
_version_ 1613509258012262400