Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality

One of the hallmarks of malignant cell populations is the ability to undergo continuous proliferation. This property allows clonal lineages to acquire sequential aberrations that can fuel increasingly autonomous growth, invasiveness, and therapeutic resistance. Innate cellular mechanisms have evolve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaswen, Paul, MacKenzie, Karen L., Keith, W. Nicol, Hentosh, Patricia, Rodier, Francis, Zhu, Jiyue, Firestone, Gary L., Matheu, Ander, Carnero, Amancio, Bilsland, Alan, Sundin, Tabetha, Honoki, Kanya, Fujii, Hiromasa, Georgakilas, Alexandros G., Amedei, Amedeo, Amin, Amr, Helferich, Bill, Boosani, Chandra S., Guha, Gunjan, Ciriolo, Maria Rosa, Chen, Sophie, Mohammed, Sulma I., Azmi, Asfar S., Bhakta, Dipita, Halicka, Dorota, Niccolai, Elena, Aquilano, Katia, Ashraf, S. Salman, Nowsheen, Somaira, Yang, Xujuan
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Academic Press 2015
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600408/
id pubmed-4600408
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-46004082016-03-22 Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality Yaswen, Paul MacKenzie, Karen L. Keith, W. Nicol Hentosh, Patricia Rodier, Francis Zhu, Jiyue Firestone, Gary L. Matheu, Ander Carnero, Amancio Bilsland, Alan Sundin, Tabetha Honoki, Kanya Fujii, Hiromasa Georgakilas, Alexandros G. Amedei, Amedeo Amin, Amr Helferich, Bill Boosani, Chandra S. Guha, Gunjan Ciriolo, Maria Rosa Chen, Sophie Mohammed, Sulma I. Azmi, Asfar S. Bhakta, Dipita Halicka, Dorota Niccolai, Elena Aquilano, Katia Ashraf, S. Salman Nowsheen, Somaira Yang, Xujuan Review One of the hallmarks of malignant cell populations is the ability to undergo continuous proliferation. This property allows clonal lineages to acquire sequential aberrations that can fuel increasingly autonomous growth, invasiveness, and therapeutic resistance. Innate cellular mechanisms have evolved to regulate replicative potential as a hedge against malignant progression. When activated in the absence of normal terminal differentiation cues, these mechanisms can result in a state of persistent cytostasis. This state, termed “senescence,” can be triggered by intrinsic cellular processes such as telomere dysfunction and oncogene expression, and by exogenous factors such as DNA damaging agents or oxidative environments. Despite differences in upstream signaling, senescence often involves convergent interdependent activation of tumor suppressors p53 and p16/pRB, but can be induced, albeit with reduced sensitivity, when these suppressors are compromised. Doses of conventional genotoxic drugs required to achieve cancer cell senescence are often much lower than doses required to achieve outright cell death. Additional therapies, such as those targeting cyclin dependent kinases or components of the PI3K signaling pathway, may induce senescence specifically in cancer cells by circumventing defects in tumor suppressor pathways or exploiting cancer cells’ heightened requirements for telomerase. Such treatments sufficient to induce cancer cell senescence could provide increased patient survival with fewer and less severe side effects than conventional cytotoxic regimens. This positive aspect is countered by important caveats regarding senescence reversibility, genomic instability, and paracrine effects that may increase heterogeneity and adaptive resistance of surviving cancer cells. Nevertheless, agents that effectively disrupt replicative immortality will likely be valuable components of new combinatorial approaches to cancer therapy. Academic Press 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4600408/ /pubmed/25869441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.007 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Yaswen, Paul
MacKenzie, Karen L.
Keith, W. Nicol
Hentosh, Patricia
Rodier, Francis
Zhu, Jiyue
Firestone, Gary L.
Matheu, Ander
Carnero, Amancio
Bilsland, Alan
Sundin, Tabetha
Honoki, Kanya
Fujii, Hiromasa
Georgakilas, Alexandros G.
Amedei, Amedeo
Amin, Amr
Helferich, Bill
Boosani, Chandra S.
Guha, Gunjan
Ciriolo, Maria Rosa
Chen, Sophie
Mohammed, Sulma I.
Azmi, Asfar S.
Bhakta, Dipita
Halicka, Dorota
Niccolai, Elena
Aquilano, Katia
Ashraf, S. Salman
Nowsheen, Somaira
Yang, Xujuan
spellingShingle Yaswen, Paul
MacKenzie, Karen L.
Keith, W. Nicol
Hentosh, Patricia
Rodier, Francis
Zhu, Jiyue
Firestone, Gary L.
Matheu, Ander
Carnero, Amancio
Bilsland, Alan
Sundin, Tabetha
Honoki, Kanya
Fujii, Hiromasa
Georgakilas, Alexandros G.
Amedei, Amedeo
Amin, Amr
Helferich, Bill
Boosani, Chandra S.
Guha, Gunjan
Ciriolo, Maria Rosa
Chen, Sophie
Mohammed, Sulma I.
Azmi, Asfar S.
Bhakta, Dipita
Halicka, Dorota
Niccolai, Elena
Aquilano, Katia
Ashraf, S. Salman
Nowsheen, Somaira
Yang, Xujuan
Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality
author_facet Yaswen, Paul
MacKenzie, Karen L.
Keith, W. Nicol
Hentosh, Patricia
Rodier, Francis
Zhu, Jiyue
Firestone, Gary L.
Matheu, Ander
Carnero, Amancio
Bilsland, Alan
Sundin, Tabetha
Honoki, Kanya
Fujii, Hiromasa
Georgakilas, Alexandros G.
Amedei, Amedeo
Amin, Amr
Helferich, Bill
Boosani, Chandra S.
Guha, Gunjan
Ciriolo, Maria Rosa
Chen, Sophie
Mohammed, Sulma I.
Azmi, Asfar S.
Bhakta, Dipita
Halicka, Dorota
Niccolai, Elena
Aquilano, Katia
Ashraf, S. Salman
Nowsheen, Somaira
Yang, Xujuan
author_sort Yaswen, Paul
title Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality
title_short Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality
title_full Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality
title_fullStr Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality
title_sort therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality
description One of the hallmarks of malignant cell populations is the ability to undergo continuous proliferation. This property allows clonal lineages to acquire sequential aberrations that can fuel increasingly autonomous growth, invasiveness, and therapeutic resistance. Innate cellular mechanisms have evolved to regulate replicative potential as a hedge against malignant progression. When activated in the absence of normal terminal differentiation cues, these mechanisms can result in a state of persistent cytostasis. This state, termed “senescence,” can be triggered by intrinsic cellular processes such as telomere dysfunction and oncogene expression, and by exogenous factors such as DNA damaging agents or oxidative environments. Despite differences in upstream signaling, senescence often involves convergent interdependent activation of tumor suppressors p53 and p16/pRB, but can be induced, albeit with reduced sensitivity, when these suppressors are compromised. Doses of conventional genotoxic drugs required to achieve cancer cell senescence are often much lower than doses required to achieve outright cell death. Additional therapies, such as those targeting cyclin dependent kinases or components of the PI3K signaling pathway, may induce senescence specifically in cancer cells by circumventing defects in tumor suppressor pathways or exploiting cancer cells’ heightened requirements for telomerase. Such treatments sufficient to induce cancer cell senescence could provide increased patient survival with fewer and less severe side effects than conventional cytotoxic regimens. This positive aspect is countered by important caveats regarding senescence reversibility, genomic instability, and paracrine effects that may increase heterogeneity and adaptive resistance of surviving cancer cells. Nevertheless, agents that effectively disrupt replicative immortality will likely be valuable components of new combinatorial approaches to cancer therapy.
publisher Academic Press
publishDate 2015
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4600408/
_version_ 1613486178450800640