Is a Cutoff of 10% Appropriate for the Change-in-Estimate Criterion of Confounder Identification?
Main Author: | Lee, Paul H. |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Japan Epidemiological Association
2014
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983286/ |
Similar Items
-
Age cutoff in lymphoma diagnosis
by: Ok, Chi Y., et al.
Published: (2015) -
Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates
by: Lee, Paul H., et al.
Published: (2016) -
MET in gastric cancer – discarding a 10% cutoff rule
by: Metzger, Marie‐Luise, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Estimation of the cutoff value of vitamin D: the Dong-gu study
by: Choi, Seong-Woo, et al.
Published: (2015) -
to changing of fault criterion
by: kiyomars kalantari, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)