Lee, P. H. (2014). Is a Cutoff of 10% Appropriate for the Change-in-Estimate Criterion of Confounder Identification? Japan Epidemiological Association.
Chicago Style CitationLee, Paul H. Is a Cutoff of 10% Appropriate for the Change-in-Estimate Criterion of Confounder Identification? Japan Epidemiological Association, 2014.
MLA CitationLee, Paul H. Is a Cutoff of 10% Appropriate for the Change-in-Estimate Criterion of Confounder Identification? Japan Epidemiological Association, 2014.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.