Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency

Reprogramming somatic cells to a pluripotent state by nucleic acid based (NAB) approaches, involving the ectopic expression of transcription factors, has emerged as a standard method. We recently demonstrated that limbal progenitors that regenerate cornea are reprogrammable to pluripotency by a non-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parameswaran, Sowmya, Balasubramanian, Sudha, Babai, Norbert, DelDebbio, Carolina B., Harms, Donald W., Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B., Rao, Mahendra S., Sharp, John G., Ahmad, Iqbal
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2012
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3466310/
id pubmed-3466310
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-34663102012-10-10 Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency Parameswaran, Sowmya Balasubramanian, Sudha Babai, Norbert DelDebbio, Carolina B. Harms, Donald W. Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B. Rao, Mahendra S. Sharp, John G. Ahmad, Iqbal Research Article Reprogramming somatic cells to a pluripotent state by nucleic acid based (NAB) approaches, involving the ectopic expression of transcription factors, has emerged as a standard method. We recently demonstrated that limbal progenitors that regenerate cornea are reprogrammable to pluripotency by a non-NAB approach through simple manipulation of microenvironment thus extending the possible therapeutic use of these readily accessible cells beyond the proven treatment of corneal diseases and injury. Therefore, to determine the validity and robustness of non-cell autonomous reprogramming of limbal progenitors for a wider clinical use, here, we have compared their reprogramming by non-NAB and NAB approaches. We observed that both approaches led to (1) the emergence of colonies displaying pluripotency markers, accompanied by a temporal reciprocal changes in limbal-specific and pluripotency gene expression, and (2) epigenetic alterations of Oct4 and Nanog, associated with the de-novo activation of their expression. While the efficiency of reprogramming and passaging of re-programmed cells were significantly better with the NAB approach, the non-NAB approach, in contrast, led to a regulated reprogramming of gene expression, and a significant decrease in the expression of Hormad1, a gene associated with immunogenic responses. The reprogramming efficiency by non-NAB approach was influenced by exosomes present in conditioned medium. Cells reprogrammed by both approaches were capable of differentiating along the three germ lineages and generating chimeras. The analysis suggests that both approaches are effective in reprogramming limbal progenitors but the non-NAB approach may be more suitable for potential clinical applications by averting the risk of insertional mutagenesis and immune responses associated with the NAB approach. Public Library of Science 2012-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3466310/ /pubmed/23056428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046734 Text en © 2012 Parameswaran et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Parameswaran, Sowmya
Balasubramanian, Sudha
Babai, Norbert
DelDebbio, Carolina B.
Harms, Donald W.
Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B.
Rao, Mahendra S.
Sharp, John G.
Ahmad, Iqbal
spellingShingle Parameswaran, Sowmya
Balasubramanian, Sudha
Babai, Norbert
DelDebbio, Carolina B.
Harms, Donald W.
Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B.
Rao, Mahendra S.
Sharp, John G.
Ahmad, Iqbal
Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency
author_facet Parameswaran, Sowmya
Balasubramanian, Sudha
Babai, Norbert
DelDebbio, Carolina B.
Harms, Donald W.
Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B.
Rao, Mahendra S.
Sharp, John G.
Ahmad, Iqbal
author_sort Parameswaran, Sowmya
title Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency
title_short Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency
title_full Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency
title_fullStr Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency
title_full_unstemmed Nucleic Acid and Non-Nucleic Acid-Based Reprogramming of Adult Limbal Progenitors to Pluripotency
title_sort nucleic acid and non-nucleic acid-based reprogramming of adult limbal progenitors to pluripotency
description Reprogramming somatic cells to a pluripotent state by nucleic acid based (NAB) approaches, involving the ectopic expression of transcription factors, has emerged as a standard method. We recently demonstrated that limbal progenitors that regenerate cornea are reprogrammable to pluripotency by a non-NAB approach through simple manipulation of microenvironment thus extending the possible therapeutic use of these readily accessible cells beyond the proven treatment of corneal diseases and injury. Therefore, to determine the validity and robustness of non-cell autonomous reprogramming of limbal progenitors for a wider clinical use, here, we have compared their reprogramming by non-NAB and NAB approaches. We observed that both approaches led to (1) the emergence of colonies displaying pluripotency markers, accompanied by a temporal reciprocal changes in limbal-specific and pluripotency gene expression, and (2) epigenetic alterations of Oct4 and Nanog, associated with the de-novo activation of their expression. While the efficiency of reprogramming and passaging of re-programmed cells were significantly better with the NAB approach, the non-NAB approach, in contrast, led to a regulated reprogramming of gene expression, and a significant decrease in the expression of Hormad1, a gene associated with immunogenic responses. The reprogramming efficiency by non-NAB approach was influenced by exosomes present in conditioned medium. Cells reprogrammed by both approaches were capable of differentiating along the three germ lineages and generating chimeras. The analysis suggests that both approaches are effective in reprogramming limbal progenitors but the non-NAB approach may be more suitable for potential clinical applications by averting the risk of insertional mutagenesis and immune responses associated with the NAB approach.
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2012
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3466310/
_version_ 1611914430415634432