Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study
This study was performed to assess the inconsistency of lesion quantification in standardised uptake value (SUV) [ 18F]-FDG between Ellipse (2-Dimensional) and Ellipsoid (3-Dimensional) quantification techniques by using PET/ CT image quality phantom. Reconstructed images of PET/CT ACR phantom was u...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia
2021
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90358/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90358/1/2021040613542341_MJMHS_0665.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848861045014134784 |
|---|---|
| author | Hanafi, Muhammad Hafiz Mohd Noor, Noramaliza Hassan, Muhammad Hishar |
| author_facet | Hanafi, Muhammad Hafiz Mohd Noor, Noramaliza Hassan, Muhammad Hishar |
| author_sort | Hanafi, Muhammad Hafiz |
| building | UPM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This study was performed to assess the inconsistency of lesion quantification in standardised uptake value (SUV) [ 18F]-FDG between Ellipse (2-Dimensional) and Ellipsoid (3-Dimensional) quantification techniques by using PET/ CT image quality phantom. Reconstructed images of PET/CT ACR phantom was used to assess the quantification of SUV (SUVmax, SUVavg and SUVmin) on selected regions of interest. Statistical analysis of paired t-test was performed to compare the lesion quantification in SUV [18F]-FDG between 2D and 3D techniques. The quantification techniques were consistently similar of assessment between 2D SUVmax and 3D SUVmax at 12mm of ROI lesion with [(0.00 ± 0.02), t(29)=-0.48, p>0.05]. However, the rest of quantification techniques of 2D SUVmax, 3D SUVmax, 2D SUVavg, 3D SUVavg, 2D SUVmin and 3D SUVmin, results shown significant inconsistency since the p >0.05]. However, the rest of quantification techniques of 2D SUVmax, 3D SUVmax, 2D SUVavg, 3D SUVavg, 2D SUVmin and 3D SUVmin, results shown significant inconsistency since the p<0.05. This phantom study has proven that there were inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T12:54:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | upm-90358 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T12:54:53Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | upm-903582021-09-10T01:01:18Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90358/ Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study Hanafi, Muhammad Hafiz Mohd Noor, Noramaliza Hassan, Muhammad Hishar This study was performed to assess the inconsistency of lesion quantification in standardised uptake value (SUV) [ 18F]-FDG between Ellipse (2-Dimensional) and Ellipsoid (3-Dimensional) quantification techniques by using PET/ CT image quality phantom. Reconstructed images of PET/CT ACR phantom was used to assess the quantification of SUV (SUVmax, SUVavg and SUVmin) on selected regions of interest. Statistical analysis of paired t-test was performed to compare the lesion quantification in SUV [18F]-FDG between 2D and 3D techniques. The quantification techniques were consistently similar of assessment between 2D SUVmax and 3D SUVmax at 12mm of ROI lesion with [(0.00 ± 0.02), t(29)=-0.48, p>0.05]. However, the rest of quantification techniques of 2D SUVmax, 3D SUVmax, 2D SUVavg, 3D SUVavg, 2D SUVmin and 3D SUVmin, results shown significant inconsistency since the p >0.05]. However, the rest of quantification techniques of 2D SUVmax, 3D SUVmax, 2D SUVavg, 3D SUVavg, 2D SUVmin and 3D SUVmin, results shown significant inconsistency since the p<0.05. This phantom study has proven that there were inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2021-04 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90358/1/2021040613542341_MJMHS_0665.pdf Hanafi, Muhammad Hafiz and Mohd Noor, Noramaliza and Hassan, Muhammad Hishar (2021) Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 17 (2). pp. 289-293. ISSN 1675-8544; ESSN: 2636-9346 https://medic.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/2021040613542341_MJMHS_0665.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Hanafi, Muhammad Hafiz Mohd Noor, Noramaliza Hassan, Muhammad Hishar Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study |
| title | Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study |
| title_full | Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study |
| title_fullStr | Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study |
| title_short | Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET/CT: a phantom study |
| title_sort | inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2d suv and 3d suv quantification techniques for [18f]-fdg pet/ct: a phantom study |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90358/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90358/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/90358/1/2021040613542341_MJMHS_0665.pdf |