Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)

Forty rescued common palm civets were anesthetized. Twenty animals received intramuscular injections of alfaxalone 5 mg/kg and medetomidine 0.05 mg/kg (A-M group), whereas twenty animals received 5 mg/kg of tiletamine and zolazepam (T-Z group). The A-M group was reversed with atipamazole 0.25 mg/kg....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad, Ali Anwar, Abd Wahab, Norsham, Yeo, Wenjing Clara, Yin, Serena Jocelyn Oh Wai, Chen, Hui Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2019
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/1/ALFAZALONE.pdf
_version_ 1848858994612895744
author Ahmad, Ali Anwar
Abd Wahab, Norsham
Yeo, Wenjing Clara
Yin, Serena Jocelyn Oh Wai
Chen, Hui Cheng
author_facet Ahmad, Ali Anwar
Abd Wahab, Norsham
Yeo, Wenjing Clara
Yin, Serena Jocelyn Oh Wai
Chen, Hui Cheng
author_sort Ahmad, Ali Anwar
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Forty rescued common palm civets were anesthetized. Twenty animals received intramuscular injections of alfaxalone 5 mg/kg and medetomidine 0.05 mg/kg (A-M group), whereas twenty animals received 5 mg/kg of tiletamine and zolazepam (T-Z group). The A-M group was reversed with atipamazole 0.25 mg/kg. There were no significant differences in the time from anesthetic injection to induction and intubation between the A-M and T-Z groups. The time from the injection of reversal in the A-M group and the time from cessation of isoflurane in the T-Z group to extubation, first response to recovery and ambulation were longer (P<0.05) in the T-Z group. The T-Z group recorded lower (P<0.05) rectal temperatures compared to the A-M group. This study showed that both drug combinations can be used effectively for the immobilization of civets. The A-M combination provided better anesthetic depth, but with higher incidence of bradycardia and hypoxemia. The recovery time was reduced significantly as atipamezole was used as a reversal agent in the A-M combination.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T12:22:17Z
format Article
id upm-80978
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T12:22:17Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-809782020-10-14T20:37:43Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/ Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus) Ahmad, Ali Anwar Abd Wahab, Norsham Yeo, Wenjing Clara Yin, Serena Jocelyn Oh Wai Chen, Hui Cheng Forty rescued common palm civets were anesthetized. Twenty animals received intramuscular injections of alfaxalone 5 mg/kg and medetomidine 0.05 mg/kg (A-M group), whereas twenty animals received 5 mg/kg of tiletamine and zolazepam (T-Z group). The A-M group was reversed with atipamazole 0.25 mg/kg. There were no significant differences in the time from anesthetic injection to induction and intubation between the A-M and T-Z groups. The time from the injection of reversal in the A-M group and the time from cessation of isoflurane in the T-Z group to extubation, first response to recovery and ambulation were longer (P<0.05) in the T-Z group. The T-Z group recorded lower (P<0.05) rectal temperatures compared to the A-M group. This study showed that both drug combinations can be used effectively for the immobilization of civets. The A-M combination provided better anesthetic depth, but with higher incidence of bradycardia and hypoxemia. The recovery time was reduced significantly as atipamezole was used as a reversal agent in the A-M combination. Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/1/ALFAZALONE.pdf Ahmad, Ali Anwar and Abd Wahab, Norsham and Yeo, Wenjing Clara and Yin, Serena Jocelyn Oh Wai and Chen, Hui Cheng (2019) Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus). Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 81 (1). pp. 48-52. ISSN 0916-7250; ESSN: 1347-7439 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361648/ 10.1292/jvms.18-0297
spellingShingle Ahmad, Ali Anwar
Abd Wahab, Norsham
Yeo, Wenjing Clara
Yin, Serena Jocelyn Oh Wai
Chen, Hui Cheng
Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_full Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_fullStr Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_short Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_sort comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (paradoxurus musangus)
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80978/1/ALFAZALONE.pdf