Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions

Despite the various benefits of rubric-referenced assessment (RRA), multiple studies have revealed its potential pitfalls. Given the scarcity of research on the limitations of RRA and its solutions in the context of Malaysian postgraduates, this study explores the limitations of RRA and proposes pot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liang, Jing Teh, Su, Luan Wong, Md Khambari, Mas Nida, O. K. Rahmat, Rahmita Wirza, Sai, Hong Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Putra Malaysia 2025
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/1/120932.pdf
_version_ 1848868250596671488
author Liang, Jing Teh
Su, Luan Wong
Md Khambari, Mas Nida
O. K. Rahmat, Rahmita Wirza
Sai, Hong Tang
author_facet Liang, Jing Teh
Su, Luan Wong
Md Khambari, Mas Nida
O. K. Rahmat, Rahmita Wirza
Sai, Hong Tang
author_sort Liang, Jing Teh
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Despite the various benefits of rubric-referenced assessment (RRA), multiple studies have revealed its potential pitfalls. Given the scarcity of research on the limitations of RRA and its solutions in the context of Malaysian postgraduates, this study explores the limitations of RRA and proposes potential strategies for improvement from the perspective of postgraduate students in Malaysia. The study adopted a case study qualitative approach and the Activity Theory as the theoretical framework. Five Malaysian postgraduate students provided their responses via two focus group discussions. The participants highlighted that rubrics may stifle creative self-expression, cause inconsistency in scoring, cause confusion among students, and be limited in catering to various learner needs. To address these issues, the participants recommended that the instructor allocate time for students to understand the rubric and engage in discussion about its content. They also proposed flexibility in rubrics to accommodate revisions based on student feedback and implementing scoring calibration sessions or training to maintain scoring consistency. Other suggestions comprised prioritising inclusive assessments, tailoring rubrics for different learner profiles, including specific numerical indicators in rubric descriptions, using a holistic rubric, and providing feedback to students according to the rubric.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T14:49:24Z
format Article
id upm-120932
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T14:49:24Z
publishDate 2025
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1209322025-10-16T03:03:17Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/ Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions Liang, Jing Teh Su, Luan Wong Md Khambari, Mas Nida O. K. Rahmat, Rahmita Wirza Sai, Hong Tang Despite the various benefits of rubric-referenced assessment (RRA), multiple studies have revealed its potential pitfalls. Given the scarcity of research on the limitations of RRA and its solutions in the context of Malaysian postgraduates, this study explores the limitations of RRA and proposes potential strategies for improvement from the perspective of postgraduate students in Malaysia. The study adopted a case study qualitative approach and the Activity Theory as the theoretical framework. Five Malaysian postgraduate students provided their responses via two focus group discussions. The participants highlighted that rubrics may stifle creative self-expression, cause inconsistency in scoring, cause confusion among students, and be limited in catering to various learner needs. To address these issues, the participants recommended that the instructor allocate time for students to understand the rubric and engage in discussion about its content. They also proposed flexibility in rubrics to accommodate revisions based on student feedback and implementing scoring calibration sessions or training to maintain scoring consistency. Other suggestions comprised prioritising inclusive assessments, tailoring rubrics for different learner profiles, including specific numerical indicators in rubric descriptions, using a holistic rubric, and providing feedback to students according to the rubric. Universiti Putra Malaysia 2025 Article PeerReviewed text en cc_by_nc_nd_4 http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/1/120932.pdf Liang, Jing Teh and Su, Luan Wong and Md Khambari, Mas Nida and O. K. Rahmat, Rahmita Wirza and Sai, Hong Tang (2025) Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 33 (2). pp. 541-562. ISSN 0128-7702; eISSN: 2231-8534 http://pertanika2.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-9044-2024 10.47836/pjssh.33.2.03
spellingShingle Liang, Jing Teh
Su, Luan Wong
Md Khambari, Mas Nida
O. K. Rahmat, Rahmita Wirza
Sai, Hong Tang
Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions
title Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions
title_full Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions
title_fullStr Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions
title_full_unstemmed Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions
title_short Exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions
title_sort exploring postgraduate students’ experience with rubric-referenced assessment: limitations and solutions
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/120932/1/120932.pdf