AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study
This study proposes an empirical study of risk assessment module for public road construction projects. A case study of a conventional road construction project for new road access for a university that is located in East Coast Malaysia is adopted in this study. Seven delay factors and twenty-two su...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor's University
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26502/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26502/1/AHP-Based%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Risk%20Assessment%20Delay.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848822552199168000 |
|---|---|
| author | Putri Zulaiha, Razi Mohamad Idris, Ali Noram Irwan, Ramli |
| author_facet | Putri Zulaiha, Razi Mohamad Idris, Ali Noram Irwan, Ramli |
| author_sort | Putri Zulaiha, Razi |
| building | UMP Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This study proposes an empirical study of risk assessment module for public road construction projects. A case study of a conventional road construction project for new road access for a university that is located in East Coast Malaysia is adopted in this study. Seven delay factors and twenty-two sub-factors were designated from a review of literature and consultations with public road experts. The designate pair-wise questionnaire survey was distributed to the road project team in accordance with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. The delay risk was assessed quantitatively by prioritizing the risk delay factors and conducting sensitivity analysis in determining the critical construction phase. This study identified the top five most prioritized factors as follows: technical (0.242), natural hazard (0.208), economic and financial (0.186), contractual (0.125), and socio-politics (0.105). The global weight obtained was ranked and the top-five of most prioritised sub-factors were determined as follows: fund risk (0.111), flood (0.099), heavy rain (0.092), unforeseen ground condition (0.086), and existing utility issue (0.076). Sensitivity analysis simplified from Expert Choice 11 programme revealed that the construction phase captured most of the risk, followed by project inception (planning stage), project design, and finally, project completion. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T02:43:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | ump-26502 |
| institution | Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T02:43:03Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Taylor's University |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | ump-265022019-11-18T07:26:31Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26502/ AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study Putri Zulaiha, Razi Mohamad Idris, Ali Noram Irwan, Ramli TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements This study proposes an empirical study of risk assessment module for public road construction projects. A case study of a conventional road construction project for new road access for a university that is located in East Coast Malaysia is adopted in this study. Seven delay factors and twenty-two sub-factors were designated from a review of literature and consultations with public road experts. The designate pair-wise questionnaire survey was distributed to the road project team in accordance with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. The delay risk was assessed quantitatively by prioritizing the risk delay factors and conducting sensitivity analysis in determining the critical construction phase. This study identified the top five most prioritized factors as follows: technical (0.242), natural hazard (0.208), economic and financial (0.186), contractual (0.125), and socio-politics (0.105). The global weight obtained was ranked and the top-five of most prioritised sub-factors were determined as follows: fund risk (0.111), flood (0.099), heavy rain (0.092), unforeseen ground condition (0.086), and existing utility issue (0.076). Sensitivity analysis simplified from Expert Choice 11 programme revealed that the construction phase captured most of the risk, followed by project inception (planning stage), project design, and finally, project completion. Taylor's University 2019 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26502/1/AHP-Based%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Risk%20Assessment%20Delay.pdf Putri Zulaiha, Razi and Mohamad Idris, Ali and Noram Irwan, Ramli (2019) AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14 (2). pp. 875-891. ISSN 1823-4690. (Published) http://jestec.taylors.edu.my/V14Issue2.htm |
| spellingShingle | TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements Putri Zulaiha, Razi Mohamad Idris, Ali Noram Irwan, Ramli AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study |
| title | AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study |
| title_full | AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study |
| title_fullStr | AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study |
| title_full_unstemmed | AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study |
| title_short | AHP-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: An empirical study |
| title_sort | ahp-based analysis of the risk assessment delay case study of public road construction project: an empirical study |
| topic | TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements |
| url | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26502/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26502/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/26502/1/AHP-Based%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Risk%20Assessment%20Delay.pdf |