Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How

The advancement of journalism technology has seen the introduction of broadcast interviews, which often feature unscripted questioning and answering between journalists and interviewees. Over the years, studies of adverseness in interviews have been focusing mostly on political interviews, with o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stippie Chee , Wei How
Format: Thesis
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/2/All.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/6/chee.pdf
_version_ 1848773684085391360
author Stippie Chee , Wei How
author_facet Stippie Chee , Wei How
author_sort Stippie Chee , Wei How
building UM Research Repository
collection Online Access
description The advancement of journalism technology has seen the introduction of broadcast interviews, which often feature unscripted questioning and answering between journalists and interviewees. Over the years, studies of adverseness in interviews have been focusing mostly on political interviews, with other types of interview such as entertainment and sports explored limitedly. This study aims to investigate the effects of match outcome on what kind of illocutionary acts and how they are used by Jose Mourinho, as well as the adverseness used in the journalists’ questioning and how they are used against Jose Mourinho by adopting Searle’s Classification of Illocutionary Acts (1976) and Clayman’s Question Analysis System (2002) as analytical frameworks. Classification of Jose Mourinho’s utterances is based on illocutionary point, direction of fit and psychological condition identification, while adverseness in the interviewers’ questions is analysed by identifying the adverseness indicators. The representative utterances were aimed at collecting the Portuguese manager’s opinions of the match, which also explains why no declarations were used. The use of directives in defeat/draw matches were used only to avoid certain questions from having to be answered, while such directives were not needed when matches were won. The use of suggestive questions by the interviewers shows their approach to “obtain” answers when matches were won. However, questions were more hostile and persistent with their follow-up questions when matches were lost/drawn. Finally, more indirectness were found after matches were lost/drawn which shows the interviewers’ cautious approach to ask questions regarding refereeing decisions.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T13:46:19Z
format Thesis
id um-8537
institution University Malaya
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T13:46:19Z
publishDate 2018
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling um-85372021-06-30T20:06:48Z Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How Stippie Chee , Wei How P Philology. Linguistics The advancement of journalism technology has seen the introduction of broadcast interviews, which often feature unscripted questioning and answering between journalists and interviewees. Over the years, studies of adverseness in interviews have been focusing mostly on political interviews, with other types of interview such as entertainment and sports explored limitedly. This study aims to investigate the effects of match outcome on what kind of illocutionary acts and how they are used by Jose Mourinho, as well as the adverseness used in the journalists’ questioning and how they are used against Jose Mourinho by adopting Searle’s Classification of Illocutionary Acts (1976) and Clayman’s Question Analysis System (2002) as analytical frameworks. Classification of Jose Mourinho’s utterances is based on illocutionary point, direction of fit and psychological condition identification, while adverseness in the interviewers’ questions is analysed by identifying the adverseness indicators. The representative utterances were aimed at collecting the Portuguese manager’s opinions of the match, which also explains why no declarations were used. The use of directives in defeat/draw matches were used only to avoid certain questions from having to be answered, while such directives were not needed when matches were won. The use of suggestive questions by the interviewers shows their approach to “obtain” answers when matches were won. However, questions were more hostile and persistent with their follow-up questions when matches were lost/drawn. Finally, more indirectness were found after matches were lost/drawn which shows the interviewers’ cautious approach to ask questions regarding refereeing decisions. 2018-01 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/2/All.pdf application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/6/chee.pdf Stippie Chee , Wei How (2018) Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How. Masters thesis, University of Malaya. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/
spellingShingle P Philology. Linguistics
Stippie Chee , Wei How
Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How
title Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How
title_full Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How
title_fullStr Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How
title_full_unstemmed Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How
title_short Illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / Stippie Chee Wei How
title_sort illocutionary acts and adversarial questioning in post-match interviews / stippie chee wei how
topic P Philology. Linguistics
url http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/2/All.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8537/6/chee.pdf