Freedom: the second peculiar institution

This thesis answers the question, “What is freedom from slavery?” Rather than pursuing this question from a philosophical or political position, this research takes the original approach of putting the question directly to key antislavery stakeholder groups: law enforcement professionals, victim ser...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rinaldi Semione, Juliana
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/65619/
_version_ 1848800249307463680
author Rinaldi Semione, Juliana
author_facet Rinaldi Semione, Juliana
author_sort Rinaldi Semione, Juliana
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This thesis answers the question, “What is freedom from slavery?” Rather than pursuing this question from a philosophical or political position, this research takes the original approach of putting the question directly to key antislavery stakeholder groups: law enforcement professionals, victim service providers, and survivors. The result is the first collection of shared conceptions of freedom from across the antislavery field and the advancement of a composite definition of freedom. This study utilizes Q methodology, which is novel but robust. The choice to use Q acknowledged and harnessed the power of subjectivity in shaping conceptions of freedom. Fieldwork took place from fall 2018 through summer 2019 at six locations in the UK and US. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected in research sessions with 73 participants. This data supports four claims about freedom. First, free will is a dominant quality of freedom. Second, freedom is subjective, but not without parameters. Third, participants from different cohorts are often in agreement. And fourth, conceptions of freedom are sometimes correlated to local support service focuses. The definition of freedom advanced in this thesis is: freedom is having free will, or the ability to do things without feeling controlled, coerced, pressured, or forced to do so; usually experienced together with choice or resilience. Detailed, practical recommendations are made for academics, the policy and practice communities—including law enforcement professionals—and multi-agency collaborations. The antislavery field at large is urged to move forward collaboratively on the basis of shared meaning around freedom.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:48:33Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-65619
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:48:33Z
publishDate 2021
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-656192021-08-04T04:42:48Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/65619/ Freedom: the second peculiar institution Rinaldi Semione, Juliana This thesis answers the question, “What is freedom from slavery?” Rather than pursuing this question from a philosophical or political position, this research takes the original approach of putting the question directly to key antislavery stakeholder groups: law enforcement professionals, victim service providers, and survivors. The result is the first collection of shared conceptions of freedom from across the antislavery field and the advancement of a composite definition of freedom. This study utilizes Q methodology, which is novel but robust. The choice to use Q acknowledged and harnessed the power of subjectivity in shaping conceptions of freedom. Fieldwork took place from fall 2018 through summer 2019 at six locations in the UK and US. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected in research sessions with 73 participants. This data supports four claims about freedom. First, free will is a dominant quality of freedom. Second, freedom is subjective, but not without parameters. Third, participants from different cohorts are often in agreement. And fourth, conceptions of freedom are sometimes correlated to local support service focuses. The definition of freedom advanced in this thesis is: freedom is having free will, or the ability to do things without feeling controlled, coerced, pressured, or forced to do so; usually experienced together with choice or resilience. Detailed, practical recommendations are made for academics, the policy and practice communities—including law enforcement professionals—and multi-agency collaborations. The antislavery field at large is urged to move forward collaboratively on the basis of shared meaning around freedom. 2021-08-04 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/65619/1/Thesis%20-%20Semione%20-%20FINAL.pdf Rinaldi Semione, Juliana (2021) Freedom: the second peculiar institution. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. human trafficking modern slavery anti-slavery antislavery modern slavery partnership human trafficking task force freedom Q method Q methodology
spellingShingle human trafficking
modern slavery
anti-slavery
antislavery
modern slavery partnership
human trafficking task force
freedom
Q method
Q methodology
Rinaldi Semione, Juliana
Freedom: the second peculiar institution
title Freedom: the second peculiar institution
title_full Freedom: the second peculiar institution
title_fullStr Freedom: the second peculiar institution
title_full_unstemmed Freedom: the second peculiar institution
title_short Freedom: the second peculiar institution
title_sort freedom: the second peculiar institution
topic human trafficking
modern slavery
anti-slavery
antislavery
modern slavery partnership
human trafficking task force
freedom
Q method
Q methodology
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/65619/