Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations

Simulations, in which healthcare professionals are observed in dialogue with role-played patients, are widely used for assessing professional skills. Medical education research suggests simulations should be as authentic as possible, but there remains a lack of linguistic research into how far such...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Atkins, Sarah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sage 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53980/
_version_ 1848799003601272832
author Atkins, Sarah
author_facet Atkins, Sarah
author_sort Atkins, Sarah
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Simulations, in which healthcare professionals are observed in dialogue with role-played patients, are widely used for assessing professional skills. Medical education research suggests simulations should be as authentic as possible, but there remains a lack of linguistic research into how far such settings authentically reproduce talk. This article presents an analysis of a corpus of general practice simulations in the UK, comparing this to a dataset of real-life GP consultations. Combining corpus linguistic and conversation analytic methodologies, key interactional features of the simulations are identified, particularly those associated with successful/unsuccessful performance in terms of the examiner’s grading. The corpus analysis identifies various forms of the phrase ‘tell me more about’ to occur significantly more frequently in the simulations compared to real GP consultations, typically in the opening sequences and most frequently in successful cases. It falls to a conversation analysis of the data, examining this phrase within the interactional context of these opening sequences, to better understand the actions it performs. Successful candidates in the simulations are found to perform a consistent sequential pattern, often incorporating this phrase. Though simulated, these interactions have real professional consequences for those being assessed. Linguistic findings about what constitutes successful interaction or differences to real-life practice therefore have important implications for professional education and assessment.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:28:45Z
format Article
id nottingham-53980
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:28:45Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Sage
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-539802018-10-13T04:32:03Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53980/ Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations Atkins, Sarah Simulations, in which healthcare professionals are observed in dialogue with role-played patients, are widely used for assessing professional skills. Medical education research suggests simulations should be as authentic as possible, but there remains a lack of linguistic research into how far such settings authentically reproduce talk. This article presents an analysis of a corpus of general practice simulations in the UK, comparing this to a dataset of real-life GP consultations. Combining corpus linguistic and conversation analytic methodologies, key interactional features of the simulations are identified, particularly those associated with successful/unsuccessful performance in terms of the examiner’s grading. The corpus analysis identifies various forms of the phrase ‘tell me more about’ to occur significantly more frequently in the simulations compared to real GP consultations, typically in the opening sequences and most frequently in successful cases. It falls to a conversation analysis of the data, examining this phrase within the interactional context of these opening sequences, to better understand the actions it performs. Successful candidates in the simulations are found to perform a consistent sequential pattern, often incorporating this phrase. Though simulated, these interactions have real professional consequences for those being assessed. Linguistic findings about what constitutes successful interaction or differences to real-life practice therefore have important implications for professional education and assessment. Sage 2018-08-10 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53980/1/Atkins%20S%20-%20Dicourse%20Studies%20-%20FINAL.pdf Atkins, Sarah (2018) Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations. Discourse Studies . ISSN 1461-7080 (In Press) Simulation; Simulated interaction; Health communication; General practice; Primary care consultations; Applied linguistics; Corpus linguistics; Conversation analysis; Communication skills; Standardisation; Assessment
spellingShingle Simulation; Simulated interaction; Health communication; General practice; Primary care consultations; Applied linguistics; Corpus linguistics; Conversation analysis; Communication skills; Standardisation; Assessment
Atkins, Sarah
Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations
title Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations
title_full Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations
title_fullStr Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations
title_full_unstemmed Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations
title_short Assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual GP consultations
title_sort assessing health professionals' communication through role-play: an interactional analysis of simulated versus actual gp consultations
topic Simulation; Simulated interaction; Health communication; General practice; Primary care consultations; Applied linguistics; Corpus linguistics; Conversation analysis; Communication skills; Standardisation; Assessment
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53980/