Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory

This article discusses the relationships and tensions between the sentencing, statutory supervision and legal rehabilitation of lawbreakers under UK legislation. It does so with reference to both the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, which allows some criminal records to become ‘spent’ after a s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henley, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sage Publications 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53850/
_version_ 1848798995332202496
author Henley, Andrew
author_facet Henley, Andrew
author_sort Henley, Andrew
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This article discusses the relationships and tensions between the sentencing, statutory supervision and legal rehabilitation of lawbreakers under UK legislation. It does so with reference to both the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, which allows some criminal records to become ‘spent’ after a set period of time, and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014, which was designed to significantly expand statutory supervision arrangements. The article also demonstrates how, post-supervision, many former lawbreakers are cast into a state of ‘civic purgatory’, before suggesting that a more fully integrated approach to rehabilitation is required.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:28:37Z
format Article
id nottingham-53850
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:28:37Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Sage Publications
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-538502018-09-07T19:54:38Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53850/ Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory Henley, Andrew This article discusses the relationships and tensions between the sentencing, statutory supervision and legal rehabilitation of lawbreakers under UK legislation. It does so with reference to both the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, which allows some criminal records to become ‘spent’ after a set period of time, and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014, which was designed to significantly expand statutory supervision arrangements. The article also demonstrates how, post-supervision, many former lawbreakers are cast into a state of ‘civic purgatory’, before suggesting that a more fully integrated approach to rehabilitation is required. Sage Publications 2018-09-30 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53850/1/Henley%20%282018%29%20Mind%20the%20gap%20Probation%20Journal.pdf Henley, Andrew (2018) Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory. Probation Journal, 65 (3). pp. 285-301. ISSN 1741-3079 https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550518776773 doi:10.1177/0264550518776773 doi:10.1177/0264550518776773
spellingShingle Henley, Andrew
Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory
title Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory
title_full Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory
title_fullStr Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory
title_full_unstemmed Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory
title_short Mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory
title_sort mind the gap: sentencing, rehabilitation and civic purgatory
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53850/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53850/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53850/