'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God

Who owns Zora Neale Hurston? That was the question asked in 1990 by Michele Wallace, in an analysis of the ways in which Hurston has been appropriated by later scholars. Wallace's pungent comparison of later critics to so many 'groupies descending on Elvis Presley's estate' in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Newman, Judie
Format: Article
Published: Modern Humanities Research Association 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/538/
_version_ 1848790427836088320
author Newman, Judie
author_facet Newman, Judie
author_sort Newman, Judie
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Who owns Zora Neale Hurston? That was the question asked in 1990 by Michele Wallace, in an analysis of the ways in which Hurston has been appropriated by later scholars. Wallace's pungent comparison of later critics to so many 'groupies descending on Elvis Presley's estate' in their haste to turn Hurston to their own purposes strikes a cautionary note for any subsequent writer. As she notes, the risk of canonization is that the work will be misused to derail the future of blackwomen in literature and literary criticism. For Wallace, Harold's introduction to his Modern Critical Views anthology of 1986 is a case in point. This article is copyright 2003 MHRA, and is included in this repository with permission.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:12:27Z
format Article
id nottingham-538
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:12:27Z
publishDate 2003
publisher Modern Humanities Research Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-5382020-05-04T20:31:49Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/538/ 'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God Newman, Judie Who owns Zora Neale Hurston? That was the question asked in 1990 by Michele Wallace, in an analysis of the ways in which Hurston has been appropriated by later scholars. Wallace's pungent comparison of later critics to so many 'groupies descending on Elvis Presley's estate' in their haste to turn Hurston to their own purposes strikes a cautionary note for any subsequent writer. As she notes, the risk of canonization is that the work will be misused to derail the future of blackwomen in literature and literary criticism. For Wallace, Harold's introduction to his Modern Critical Views anthology of 1986 is a case in point. This article is copyright 2003 MHRA, and is included in this repository with permission. Modern Humanities Research Association 2003-10 Article NonPeerReviewed Newman, Judie (2003) 'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God. Modern Language Review, 98 (4). pp. 817-828. zora neale hurston eyes watching god wallace harold bloom
spellingShingle zora neale hurston
eyes
watching
god
wallace harold bloom
Newman, Judie
'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God
title 'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God
title_full 'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God
title_fullStr 'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God
title_full_unstemmed 'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God
title_short 'Dis ain't gimme, Florida': Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God
title_sort 'dis ain't gimme, florida': zora neale hurston's their eyes were watching god
topic zora neale hurston
eyes
watching
god
wallace harold bloom
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/538/