Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men

Sarcopenia results from the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and reduced function in older age. It is likely to be associated with the well‐documented reduction of motor unit numbers innervating limb muscles and the increase in size of surviving motor units via reinnervation of denervated fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piasecki, M., Ireland, A., Piasecki, J., Stashuk, D.W., Swiecicka, A., Rutter, M.K., Jones, D.A., McPhee, J.S.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51831/
_version_ 1848798584490688512
author Piasecki, M.
Ireland, A.
Piasecki, J.
Stashuk, D.W.
Swiecicka, A.
Rutter, M.K.
Jones, D.A.
McPhee, J.S.
author_facet Piasecki, M.
Ireland, A.
Piasecki, J.
Stashuk, D.W.
Swiecicka, A.
Rutter, M.K.
Jones, D.A.
McPhee, J.S.
author_sort Piasecki, M.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Sarcopenia results from the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and reduced function in older age. It is likely to be associated with the well‐documented reduction of motor unit numbers innervating limb muscles and the increase in size of surviving motor units via reinnervation of denervated fibres. However, no evidence exists to confirm the extent of motor unit remodelling in sarcopenic individuals. The aim of the present study was to compare motor unit size and number between young (n = 48), non‐sarcopenic old (n = 13), pre‐sarcopenic (n = 53) and sarcopenic (n = 29) men. Motor unit potentials (MUPs) were isolated from intramuscular and surface EMG recordings. The motor unit numbers were reduced in all groups of old compared with young men (all P < 0.001). MUPs were higher in non‐sarcopenic and pre‐sarcopenic men compared with young men (P = 0.039 and 0.001 respectively), but not in the vastus lateralis of sarcopenic old (P = 0.485). The results suggest that extensive motor unit remodelling occurs relatively early during ageing, exceeds the loss of muscle mass and precedes sarcopenia. Reinnervation of denervated muscle fibres probably expands the motor unit size in the non‐sarcopenic and pre‐sarcopenic old, but not in the sarcopenic old. These findings suggest that a failure to expand the motor unit size distinguishes sarcopenic from pre‐sarcopenic muscles.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:22:06Z
format Article
id nottingham-51831
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:22:06Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-518312020-05-04T19:35:23Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51831/ Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men Piasecki, M. Ireland, A. Piasecki, J. Stashuk, D.W. Swiecicka, A. Rutter, M.K. Jones, D.A. McPhee, J.S. Sarcopenia results from the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and reduced function in older age. It is likely to be associated with the well‐documented reduction of motor unit numbers innervating limb muscles and the increase in size of surviving motor units via reinnervation of denervated fibres. However, no evidence exists to confirm the extent of motor unit remodelling in sarcopenic individuals. The aim of the present study was to compare motor unit size and number between young (n = 48), non‐sarcopenic old (n = 13), pre‐sarcopenic (n = 53) and sarcopenic (n = 29) men. Motor unit potentials (MUPs) were isolated from intramuscular and surface EMG recordings. The motor unit numbers were reduced in all groups of old compared with young men (all P < 0.001). MUPs were higher in non‐sarcopenic and pre‐sarcopenic men compared with young men (P = 0.039 and 0.001 respectively), but not in the vastus lateralis of sarcopenic old (P = 0.485). The results suggest that extensive motor unit remodelling occurs relatively early during ageing, exceeds the loss of muscle mass and precedes sarcopenia. Reinnervation of denervated muscle fibres probably expands the motor unit size in the non‐sarcopenic and pre‐sarcopenic old, but not in the sarcopenic old. These findings suggest that a failure to expand the motor unit size distinguishes sarcopenic from pre‐sarcopenic muscles. Wiley 2018-05-01 Article PeerReviewed Piasecki, M., Ireland, A., Piasecki, J., Stashuk, D.W., Swiecicka, A., Rutter, M.K., Jones, D.A. and McPhee, J.S. (2018) Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men. Journal of Physiology, 596 (9). pp. 1627-1637. ISSN 1469-7793 https://doi.org/10.1113/JP275520 doi:10.1113/JP275520 doi:10.1113/JP275520
spellingShingle Piasecki, M.
Ireland, A.
Piasecki, J.
Stashuk, D.W.
Swiecicka, A.
Rutter, M.K.
Jones, D.A.
McPhee, J.S.
Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men
title Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men
title_full Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men
title_fullStr Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men
title_full_unstemmed Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men
title_short Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men
title_sort failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51831/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51831/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51831/