Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks

Background: Psychosocial risk management [Psychosocial Risk Management Approach (PRIMA)] has, through the years, been applied in several organizations in various industries and countries globally. PRIMA principles have also been translated into international frameworks, such as PRIMA-EF (European fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly, Leka, Stavroula, Zwetsloot, Gerard I.J.M.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43934/
_version_ 1848796800190775296
author Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly
Leka, Stavroula
Zwetsloot, Gerard I.J.M.
author_facet Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly
Leka, Stavroula
Zwetsloot, Gerard I.J.M.
author_sort Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Psychosocial risk management [Psychosocial Risk Management Approach (PRIMA)] has, through the years, been applied in several organizations in various industries and countries globally. PRIMA principles have also been translated into international frameworks, such as PRIMA-EF (European framework) and the World Health Organization Healthy Workplace Framework. Over the past 10 years, an oil and gas company has put efforts into adopting and implementing international frameworks and standards for psychosocial risk management. More specifically, the company uses a PRIMA. Methods: This study explores available quantitative and qualitative risk data collected through the PRIMA method over the past 8 years in order to explore specific and common psychosocial risks in the petroleum industry. Results: The analyses showed a significant correlation between job resources and symptoms of work-related stress, there was a significant correlation between job demands and symptoms of work-related stress, and there were differences in psychosocial risk factors and symptoms of work-related stress onshore and offshore. The study also offers recommendations on how the results can further be utilized in building a robust system for managing psychosocial risks in the industry. Conclusion: The results from the analyses have provided meaningful and important information about the company-specific psychosocial risk factors and their impact on health and well-being.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:53:44Z
format Article
id nottingham-43934
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:53:44Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-439342020-05-04T19:52:04Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43934/ Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly Leka, Stavroula Zwetsloot, Gerard I.J.M. Background: Psychosocial risk management [Psychosocial Risk Management Approach (PRIMA)] has, through the years, been applied in several organizations in various industries and countries globally. PRIMA principles have also been translated into international frameworks, such as PRIMA-EF (European framework) and the World Health Organization Healthy Workplace Framework. Over the past 10 years, an oil and gas company has put efforts into adopting and implementing international frameworks and standards for psychosocial risk management. More specifically, the company uses a PRIMA. Methods: This study explores available quantitative and qualitative risk data collected through the PRIMA method over the past 8 years in order to explore specific and common psychosocial risks in the petroleum industry. Results: The analyses showed a significant correlation between job resources and symptoms of work-related stress, there was a significant correlation between job demands and symptoms of work-related stress, and there were differences in psychosocial risk factors and symptoms of work-related stress onshore and offshore. The study also offers recommendations on how the results can further be utilized in building a robust system for managing psychosocial risks in the industry. Conclusion: The results from the analyses have provided meaningful and important information about the company-specific psychosocial risk factors and their impact on health and well-being. Elsevier 2018-03 Article PeerReviewed Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly, Leka, Stavroula and Zwetsloot, Gerard I.J.M. (2018) Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks. Safety and Health at Work, 9 (1). pp. 63-70. ISSN 2093-7997 oil and gas industry psychosocial risk factors psychosocial risk management http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791117300343 doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.05.001 doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.05.001
spellingShingle oil and gas industry
psychosocial risk factors
psychosocial risk management
Bergh, Linn Iren Vestly
Leka, Stavroula
Zwetsloot, Gerard I.J.M.
Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks
title Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks
title_full Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks
title_fullStr Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks
title_full_unstemmed Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks
title_short Tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks
title_sort tailoring psychosocial risk assessment in the oil and gas industry by exploring specific and common psychosocial risks
topic oil and gas industry
psychosocial risk factors
psychosocial risk management
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43934/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43934/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43934/