Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases
The purpose of this article is to consider the case law on the requirement of standing to bring judicial review proceedings to challenge decisions made in the context of public procurement. There are suggestions in this case law that the approach to standing in such cases is narrower than that norma...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Sweet and Maxwell
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34739/ |
| _version_ | 1848794925097811968 |
|---|---|
| author | Bailey, Stephen H. |
| author_facet | Bailey, Stephen H. |
| author_sort | Bailey, Stephen H. |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The purpose of this article is to consider the case law on the requirement of standing to bring judicial review proceedings to challenge decisions made in the context of public procurement. There are suggestions in this case law that the approach to standing in such cases is narrower than that normally adopted in judicial review proceedings. It is the contention of this article that such suggestions should be firmly resisted. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:23:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-34739 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:23:56Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Sweet and Maxwell |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-347392020-05-04T17:20:41Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34739/ Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases Bailey, Stephen H. The purpose of this article is to consider the case law on the requirement of standing to bring judicial review proceedings to challenge decisions made in the context of public procurement. There are suggestions in this case law that the approach to standing in such cases is narrower than that normally adopted in judicial review proceedings. It is the contention of this article that such suggestions should be firmly resisted. Sweet and Maxwell 2015-12-01 Article PeerReviewed Bailey, Stephen H. (2015) Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases. Public Procurement Law Review, 24 (4). pp. 122-132. ISSN 0963-8245 Judicial Review; Standing; Public Procurement |
| spellingShingle | Judicial Review; Standing; Public Procurement Bailey, Stephen H. Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases |
| title | Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases |
| title_full | Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases |
| title_fullStr | Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases |
| title_short | Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases |
| title_sort | reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases |
| topic | Judicial Review; Standing; Public Procurement |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34739/ |