Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review

Aim: The aim of this dissertation is to critically review the literature surrounding the accuracy of nurses’ documentation of the EWS. This critical review aims to examine the quality and methods of the current research on EWS documentation and whether these can be enhanced in any way. Background:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bhogal, Gurpreet Kaur
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26859/
_version_ 1848793260353388544
author Bhogal, Gurpreet Kaur
author_facet Bhogal, Gurpreet Kaur
author_sort Bhogal, Gurpreet Kaur
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: The aim of this dissertation is to critically review the literature surrounding the accuracy of nurses’ documentation of the EWS. This critical review aims to examine the quality and methods of the current research on EWS documentation and whether these can be enhanced in any way. Background: Assessment tools, such as the EWS, implemented in nursing care are vital due to their preventative nature. Instruments such as the EWS are viewed as highly integral in assessing, planning and implementing the correct care for a patient. However, policies and research identify that nurses do not comply with the guidelines and protocol for the use of the EWS. The relationship between increased rates of mortality and the number of physiological abnormalities is directly proportional, therefore, if abnormal observations are detected and reported by the nurse then mortality rates within the hospital setting should be reduced. The EWS plays a great role in this; however, it needs to be implemented correctly by the nurse to aid patient care and safety in a significant manner. Method: A critical review was employed to meet the aim of this dissertation. This method was chosen instead of a systematic review as systematic reviews process large quantities of existing research however, the topic of EWS is quite under researched; therefore a critical review seemed more appropriate. Results: EWS documentation is poor and often incomplete. The RR is especially neglected when recording vital signs. Although training programmes are put into place they do not always result in changing staff behaviour. Conclusion: Overall, EWS documentation needs to improve. It is recommended that more qualitative research be conducted, teamed with theoretical frameworks, to find out why documentation is poor. Also, to give research more merit RCTs would be useful too.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:57:28Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-26859
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:57:28Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-268592017-10-19T13:39:00Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26859/ Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review Bhogal, Gurpreet Kaur Aim: The aim of this dissertation is to critically review the literature surrounding the accuracy of nurses’ documentation of the EWS. This critical review aims to examine the quality and methods of the current research on EWS documentation and whether these can be enhanced in any way. Background: Assessment tools, such as the EWS, implemented in nursing care are vital due to their preventative nature. Instruments such as the EWS are viewed as highly integral in assessing, planning and implementing the correct care for a patient. However, policies and research identify that nurses do not comply with the guidelines and protocol for the use of the EWS. The relationship between increased rates of mortality and the number of physiological abnormalities is directly proportional, therefore, if abnormal observations are detected and reported by the nurse then mortality rates within the hospital setting should be reduced. The EWS plays a great role in this; however, it needs to be implemented correctly by the nurse to aid patient care and safety in a significant manner. Method: A critical review was employed to meet the aim of this dissertation. This method was chosen instead of a systematic review as systematic reviews process large quantities of existing research however, the topic of EWS is quite under researched; therefore a critical review seemed more appropriate. Results: EWS documentation is poor and often incomplete. The RR is especially neglected when recording vital signs. Although training programmes are put into place they do not always result in changing staff behaviour. Conclusion: Overall, EWS documentation needs to improve. It is recommended that more qualitative research be conducted, teamed with theoretical frameworks, to find out why documentation is poor. Also, to give research more merit RCTs would be useful too. 2013 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26859/1/Final_dissertation.pdf Bhogal, Gurpreet Kaur (2013) Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review. [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Bhogal, Gurpreet Kaur
Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review
title Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review
title_full Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review
title_short Are Early Warning Scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: A Critical Review
title_sort are early warning scores documented accurately and correctly by nurses: a critical review
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/26859/