Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice?

Company X is a US multinational pharmaceutical excipient company. It currently exports its product in Southeast Asia through various channels, by either distributor, sales agent or its own subsidiary. The choice of international distribution channels is of paramount importance to any industrial firm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: YAP, ENG SENG
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2010
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/23594/
_version_ 1848792592564617216
author YAP, ENG SENG
author_facet YAP, ENG SENG
author_sort YAP, ENG SENG
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Company X is a US multinational pharmaceutical excipient company. It currently exports its product in Southeast Asia through various channels, by either distributor, sales agent or its own subsidiary. The choice of international distribution channels is of paramount importance to any industrial firm and a mistake in choice can be extremely costly to overcome in terms of time, resources and market opportunities. Not contented with the recent sales performance, the management team of Company X is tasked to analyse the best export mode for each of these countries given their apparent differences in business environment, political structure and financial risk. The aim of this study is to identify the right export mode, using the strategic rule. A number of hypothesis have been discussed in the past research to address this issue, with the notable ones being transaction cost economics, internationalization, resource-based, strategic and other propositions. However, transaction cost economic is the only theory that has been tested extensively and supported with relatively more positive empirical results. To achieve the study objective, an eclectic model combining transaction economic, resourced-base and strategic theories is used by the author for the case study. Model from Aulakh and Kotabe (1997) has been adopted and extended in order to apply a comprehensive and systematic approach that guides a rationale analysis of the external forces and internal influences, which provides a useful tool to decide the degree of integration in the export channel that can best fit the company and its offering. The results pointed to the fact that, in the medium to long term, Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam markets appear to be attractive. For Singapore, the market stability and low external uncertainties has made it suitable to establish own subsidiary. As for Indonesia and Vietnam, it is more appropriate to distribute through the sales agents at this point in time, due largely to the country risks, volatility and diversities in those market. For the rest of the countries that are in the low market growth position, channel design in the form of sales agent or distributor is preferred. Export channel structure is not only critical at the establishment of marketing abroad, periodic review and evaluation of the structure is just as important as the business environment is changing faster than ever. Having the framework as the core, using multidimensional approach for decision making in a systematic and procedural way is confirmed to be useful to managers in practice.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:46:51Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-23594
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:46:51Z
publishDate 2010
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-235942017-12-30T02:25:32Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/23594/ Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice? YAP, ENG SENG Company X is a US multinational pharmaceutical excipient company. It currently exports its product in Southeast Asia through various channels, by either distributor, sales agent or its own subsidiary. The choice of international distribution channels is of paramount importance to any industrial firm and a mistake in choice can be extremely costly to overcome in terms of time, resources and market opportunities. Not contented with the recent sales performance, the management team of Company X is tasked to analyse the best export mode for each of these countries given their apparent differences in business environment, political structure and financial risk. The aim of this study is to identify the right export mode, using the strategic rule. A number of hypothesis have been discussed in the past research to address this issue, with the notable ones being transaction cost economics, internationalization, resource-based, strategic and other propositions. However, transaction cost economic is the only theory that has been tested extensively and supported with relatively more positive empirical results. To achieve the study objective, an eclectic model combining transaction economic, resourced-base and strategic theories is used by the author for the case study. Model from Aulakh and Kotabe (1997) has been adopted and extended in order to apply a comprehensive and systematic approach that guides a rationale analysis of the external forces and internal influences, which provides a useful tool to decide the degree of integration in the export channel that can best fit the company and its offering. The results pointed to the fact that, in the medium to long term, Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam markets appear to be attractive. For Singapore, the market stability and low external uncertainties has made it suitable to establish own subsidiary. As for Indonesia and Vietnam, it is more appropriate to distribute through the sales agents at this point in time, due largely to the country risks, volatility and diversities in those market. For the rest of the countries that are in the low market growth position, channel design in the form of sales agent or distributor is preferred. Export channel structure is not only critical at the establishment of marketing abroad, periodic review and evaluation of the structure is just as important as the business environment is changing faster than ever. Having the framework as the core, using multidimensional approach for decision making in a systematic and procedural way is confirmed to be useful to managers in practice. 2010 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/23594/1/10MBAyeseng07.pdf YAP, ENG SENG (2010) Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice? [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle YAP, ENG SENG
Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice?
title Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice?
title_full Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice?
title_fullStr Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice?
title_full_unstemmed Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice?
title_short Distributor, Sales Agent Or Own Subsidiary In The Export Choice?
title_sort distributor, sales agent or own subsidiary in the export choice?
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/23594/