Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury

Background: Contemporary models of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) suggest that emotional vulnerabilities, negative self-schemas, and beliefs about NSSI work together to differentiate students who self-injure from those who do not. However, it is unclear how these mechanisms are differentially relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duncan-Plummer, Thomas, Hasking, Penelope, Tonta, Kate, Boyes, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/92824
_version_ 1848765669156323328
author Duncan-Plummer, Thomas
Hasking, Penelope
Tonta, Kate
Boyes, Mark
author_facet Duncan-Plummer, Thomas
Hasking, Penelope
Tonta, Kate
Boyes, Mark
author_sort Duncan-Plummer, Thomas
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Contemporary models of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) suggest that emotional vulnerabilities, negative self-schemas, and beliefs about NSSI work together to differentiate students who self-injure from those who do not. However, it is unclear how these mechanisms are differentially related among students with and without a history of NSSI. Considering this, we used a network analysis approach to explore how students with and without a history of NSSI vary in processing their emotional experiences in relation to their self-concepts and beliefs about NSSI. Method: A sample of 480 university students (Mage = 21.18, SD = 2.43; 73.5 % female) completed self-report measures about their perceived emotional experiences (e.g., emotional reactivity, emotion regulation difficulties), self-concepts (e.g., self-esteem, self-efficacy), and NSSI. Results: A network comparison test revealed that students with a history of NSSI perceived themselves to have difficulties regulating particularly intense, unwanted negative emotions. In light of this, students with a history of NSSI expected some benefits of NSSI (e.g., emotion regulation) regardless of potential barriers (e.g., pain). Conversely, for students without a history of NSSI, expecting NSSI to have aversive outcomes was tied to expecting NSSI to have few benefits. Limitations: The cross-sectional design limits inferences to be made about the network structures. Conclusions: Students with and without a history of NSSI appear to differ in their cognitive processing of negative emotions and strategies used to deal with these emotions.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:38:55Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-92824
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language eng
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:38:55Z
publishDate 2023
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-928242023-07-26T03:18:35Z Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury Duncan-Plummer, Thomas Hasking, Penelope Tonta, Kate Boyes, Mark Benefits and barriers Cognitive-emotional Emotion regulation Network analysis Network comparison test Non-suicidal self-injury Humans Female Young Adult Adult Male Cross-Sectional Studies Emotions Self-Injurious Behavior Students Cognition Humans Cross-Sectional Studies Self-Injurious Behavior Emotions Cognition Students Adult Female Male Young Adult Background: Contemporary models of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) suggest that emotional vulnerabilities, negative self-schemas, and beliefs about NSSI work together to differentiate students who self-injure from those who do not. However, it is unclear how these mechanisms are differentially related among students with and without a history of NSSI. Considering this, we used a network analysis approach to explore how students with and without a history of NSSI vary in processing their emotional experiences in relation to their self-concepts and beliefs about NSSI. Method: A sample of 480 university students (Mage = 21.18, SD = 2.43; 73.5 % female) completed self-report measures about their perceived emotional experiences (e.g., emotional reactivity, emotion regulation difficulties), self-concepts (e.g., self-esteem, self-efficacy), and NSSI. Results: A network comparison test revealed that students with a history of NSSI perceived themselves to have difficulties regulating particularly intense, unwanted negative emotions. In light of this, students with a history of NSSI expected some benefits of NSSI (e.g., emotion regulation) regardless of potential barriers (e.g., pain). Conversely, for students without a history of NSSI, expecting NSSI to have aversive outcomes was tied to expecting NSSI to have few benefits. Limitations: The cross-sectional design limits inferences to be made about the network structures. Conclusions: Students with and without a history of NSSI appear to differ in their cognitive processing of negative emotions and strategies used to deal with these emotions. 2023 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/92824 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.054 eng http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ fulltext
spellingShingle Benefits and barriers
Cognitive-emotional
Emotion regulation
Network analysis
Network comparison test
Non-suicidal self-injury
Humans
Female
Young Adult
Adult
Male
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emotions
Self-Injurious Behavior
Students
Cognition
Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Self-Injurious Behavior
Emotions
Cognition
Students
Adult
Female
Male
Young Adult
Duncan-Plummer, Thomas
Hasking, Penelope
Tonta, Kate
Boyes, Mark
Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury
title Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury
title_full Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury
title_fullStr Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury
title_short Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury
title_sort cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury
topic Benefits and barriers
Cognitive-emotional
Emotion regulation
Network analysis
Network comparison test
Non-suicidal self-injury
Humans
Female
Young Adult
Adult
Male
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emotions
Self-Injurious Behavior
Students
Cognition
Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Self-Injurious Behavior
Emotions
Cognition
Students
Adult
Female
Male
Young Adult
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1173043
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/92824