Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member

Our research examined how team age diversity can be either detrimental or beneficial for team performance depending on team agreeableness minimum. In age diverse teams, a disagreeable teammate may trigger age-based stereotypes about his/her social group, thereby activating social categorization. Thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luksyte, A., Avery, D.R., Parker, Sharon, Wang, Y., Johnson, L.U., Crepeau, L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: WILEY 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE170100182
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/92795
_version_ 1848765666313633792
author Luksyte, A.
Avery, D.R.
Parker, Sharon
Wang, Y.
Johnson, L.U.
Crepeau, L.
author_facet Luksyte, A.
Avery, D.R.
Parker, Sharon
Wang, Y.
Johnson, L.U.
Crepeau, L.
author_sort Luksyte, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Our research examined how team age diversity can be either detrimental or beneficial for team performance depending on team agreeableness minimum. In age diverse teams, a disagreeable teammate may trigger age-based stereotypes about his/her social group, thereby activating social categorization. This would result in decreased relational team functioning and worsened team performance. When the least agreeable member scores high on agreeableness, negative social categorization processes may not be triggered in age diverse teams. They may focus on informational diversity with beneficial effects for team relational processes and team performance. We tested our model in three samples (Study 1: k = 81, N = 254; Study 2: k = 109, N = 434; Study 3: k = 195, N = 1784) wherein performance was measured both objectively (Studies 1 and 2) and subjectively (Study 3). In both Studies 1 and 2, team age diversity was positively related to team performance when team agreeableness minimum was high. In Study 2, when the least agreeable person scored low on agreeableness, greater age diversity resulted in lower performance, and this relationship was mediated by higher interpersonal conflict. In Study 3, these interactive effects transpire via reduced team cohesion—another aspect of relational team functioning.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:38:52Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-92795
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:38:52Z
publishDate 2022
publisher WILEY
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-927952023-11-01T04:06:23Z Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member Luksyte, A. Avery, D.R. Parker, Sharon Wang, Y. Johnson, L.U. Crepeau, L. Social Sciences Business Psychology, Applied Management Business & Economics Psychology team age diversity team agreeableness minimum team cohesion team interpersonal conflict team performance team personality ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR JOB-RELATED DIVERSITY PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS GENDER DIVERSITY LEVEL DIVERSITY MODERATING ROLE SURFACE-LEVEL CONFLICT TASK COHESION Our research examined how team age diversity can be either detrimental or beneficial for team performance depending on team agreeableness minimum. In age diverse teams, a disagreeable teammate may trigger age-based stereotypes about his/her social group, thereby activating social categorization. This would result in decreased relational team functioning and worsened team performance. When the least agreeable member scores high on agreeableness, negative social categorization processes may not be triggered in age diverse teams. They may focus on informational diversity with beneficial effects for team relational processes and team performance. We tested our model in three samples (Study 1: k = 81, N = 254; Study 2: k = 109, N = 434; Study 3: k = 195, N = 1784) wherein performance was measured both objectively (Studies 1 and 2) and subjectively (Study 3). In both Studies 1 and 2, team age diversity was positively related to team performance when team agreeableness minimum was high. In Study 2, when the least agreeable person scored low on agreeableness, greater age diversity resulted in lower performance, and this relationship was mediated by higher interpersonal conflict. In Study 3, these interactive effects transpire via reduced team cohesion—another aspect of relational team functioning. 2022 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/92795 10.1002/job.2570 English http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE170100182 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL160100033 WILEY fulltext
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Business
Psychology, Applied
Management
Business & Economics
Psychology
team age diversity
team agreeableness minimum
team cohesion
team interpersonal conflict
team performance
team personality
ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR
JOB-RELATED DIVERSITY
PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS
GENDER DIVERSITY
LEVEL DIVERSITY
MODERATING ROLE
SURFACE-LEVEL
CONFLICT
TASK
COHESION
Luksyte, A.
Avery, D.R.
Parker, Sharon
Wang, Y.
Johnson, L.U.
Crepeau, L.
Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member
title Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member
title_full Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member
title_fullStr Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member
title_full_unstemmed Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member
title_short Age diversity in teams: Examining the impact of the least agreeable member
title_sort age diversity in teams: examining the impact of the least agreeable member
topic Social Sciences
Business
Psychology, Applied
Management
Business & Economics
Psychology
team age diversity
team agreeableness minimum
team cohesion
team interpersonal conflict
team performance
team personality
ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR
JOB-RELATED DIVERSITY
PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIPS
GENDER DIVERSITY
LEVEL DIVERSITY
MODERATING ROLE
SURFACE-LEVEL
CONFLICT
TASK
COHESION
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE170100182
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE170100182
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/92795