Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum

There is a strong rationale for people seeking asylum and refugees given temporary protection to be key beneficiaries of Australian higher education equity practices. However, despite the extreme precarity they face, this group remains among the most educationally disadvantaged populations in Austra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baker, Sally, Field, Rebecca, Burke, Rachel, Hartley, Lisa, Fleay, Caroline
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: WILEY 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/82090
_version_ 1848764472218353664
author Baker, Sally
Field, Rebecca
Burke, Rachel
Hartley, Lisa
Fleay, Caroline
author_facet Baker, Sally
Field, Rebecca
Burke, Rachel
Hartley, Lisa
Fleay, Caroline
author_sort Baker, Sally
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description There is a strong rationale for people seeking asylum and refugees given temporary protection to be key beneficiaries of Australian higher education equity practices. However, despite the extreme precarity they face, this group remains among the most educationally disadvantaged populations in Australia. Here, we use critical discourse analysis to examine the publicly available statements of 38 Australian universities to identify discursive representations of equity practices and connections, with our analytic gaze focused through the lens of people seeking asylum. Using a three‐part analytic heuristic examining ‘statements’, ‘practices’ and ‘connections’, we offer a critical discourse analysis of how each public university expresses its commitment to the equity agenda in powerful stakeholder‐facing documents—such as annual reports, strategic plans and media releases—and we compare this analysis against institutional stated practices with regard to people seeking asylum. In identifying misalignments between equity statements and stated practices, we suggest that institutional equity narratives articulate ‘imagined worlds’, in which all marginalised groups can access higher education. We argue that now is the time to move beyond these ‘imagined worlds’, to enact stated commitments to universal education, by instituting real and effective practices to facilitate equitable access to Australian higher education for people seeking asylum.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:19:54Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-82090
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:19:54Z
publishDate 2020
publisher WILEY
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-820902021-02-22T01:24:00Z Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum Baker, Sally Field, Rebecca Burke, Rachel Hartley, Lisa Fleay, Caroline Social Sciences Education & Educational Research equity in higher education people seeking asylum critical discourse analysis Australia WIDENING PARTICIPATION UNIVERSITY DISCOURSE DIVERSITY EQUALITY There is a strong rationale for people seeking asylum and refugees given temporary protection to be key beneficiaries of Australian higher education equity practices. However, despite the extreme precarity they face, this group remains among the most educationally disadvantaged populations in Australia. Here, we use critical discourse analysis to examine the publicly available statements of 38 Australian universities to identify discursive representations of equity practices and connections, with our analytic gaze focused through the lens of people seeking asylum. Using a three‐part analytic heuristic examining ‘statements’, ‘practices’ and ‘connections’, we offer a critical discourse analysis of how each public university expresses its commitment to the equity agenda in powerful stakeholder‐facing documents—such as annual reports, strategic plans and media releases—and we compare this analysis against institutional stated practices with regard to people seeking asylum. In identifying misalignments between equity statements and stated practices, we suggest that institutional equity narratives articulate ‘imagined worlds’, in which all marginalised groups can access higher education. We argue that now is the time to move beyond these ‘imagined worlds’, to enact stated commitments to universal education, by instituting real and effective practices to facilitate equitable access to Australian higher education for people seeking asylum. 2020 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/82090 10.1002/berj.3691 English WILEY restricted
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Education & Educational Research
equity in higher education
people seeking asylum
critical discourse analysis
Australia
WIDENING PARTICIPATION
UNIVERSITY
DISCOURSE
DIVERSITY
EQUALITY
Baker, Sally
Field, Rebecca
Burke, Rachel
Hartley, Lisa
Fleay, Caroline
Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum
title Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum
title_full Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum
title_fullStr Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum
title_full_unstemmed Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum
title_short Discursive constructions of equity in Australian higher education: Imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum
title_sort discursive constructions of equity in australian higher education: imagined worlds and the case of people seeking asylum
topic Social Sciences
Education & Educational Research
equity in higher education
people seeking asylum
critical discourse analysis
Australia
WIDENING PARTICIPATION
UNIVERSITY
DISCOURSE
DIVERSITY
EQUALITY
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/82090