Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities
Students in enabling programs bring a richness and diversity to universities. This diversity is important both to the vitality of the institutions, and the social equity outcomes that enabling programs hope to foster. Yet, in crossing the bridge between pre-university and university entry, these...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference Paper |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Online Access: | https://fabenz.org.nz/proceeding-from-fabenz-conference-2016/ http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80712 |
| _version_ | 1848764256160317440 |
|---|---|
| author | Crawford, Nicole Lisciandro, Joanne Jones, Angela Jaceglav, Megan McCall, Deanna Bunn, Rosalie Cameron, Helen Westacott, Marguerite Andersen, Sharon |
| author_facet | Crawford, Nicole Lisciandro, Joanne Jones, Angela Jaceglav, Megan McCall, Deanna Bunn, Rosalie Cameron, Helen Westacott, Marguerite Andersen, Sharon |
| author_sort | Crawford, Nicole |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Students in enabling programs bring a richness and diversity to universities.
This diversity is important both to the vitality of the institutions, and the social
equity outcomes that enabling programs hope to foster. Yet, in crossing the
bridge between pre-university and university entry, these students are often
confronted by multiple challenges. Within the literature, concerns such as
mental health difficulties, complex family issues and being first in the family to
attend university have been shown to impact on a student’s ability to succeed
academically, develop a sense of belonging in the university community and
negotiate personal hurdles. While many universities provide counselling
services, which are of great value, they are but one element in a more
comprehensive model of support for the wellbeing of students in enabling
programs.
This paper will present the key features of four models of supporting enabling
students’ wellbeing that have been developed at four institutions. The
participating universities are the University of Tasmania, Murdoch University,
The University of Newcastle, and the University of the Sunshine Coast. The
models are unique, and also share commonalities, in terms of whether the
support is embedded, centrally-located, proactive, informal or holistic. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:16:28Z |
| format | Conference Paper |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-80712 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T11:16:28Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-807122021-01-15T01:11:49Z Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities Crawford, Nicole Lisciandro, Joanne Jones, Angela Jaceglav, Megan McCall, Deanna Bunn, Rosalie Cameron, Helen Westacott, Marguerite Andersen, Sharon Students in enabling programs bring a richness and diversity to universities. This diversity is important both to the vitality of the institutions, and the social equity outcomes that enabling programs hope to foster. Yet, in crossing the bridge between pre-university and university entry, these students are often confronted by multiple challenges. Within the literature, concerns such as mental health difficulties, complex family issues and being first in the family to attend university have been shown to impact on a student’s ability to succeed academically, develop a sense of belonging in the university community and negotiate personal hurdles. While many universities provide counselling services, which are of great value, they are but one element in a more comprehensive model of support for the wellbeing of students in enabling programs. This paper will present the key features of four models of supporting enabling students’ wellbeing that have been developed at four institutions. The participating universities are the University of Tasmania, Murdoch University, The University of Newcastle, and the University of the Sunshine Coast. The models are unique, and also share commonalities, in terms of whether the support is embedded, centrally-located, proactive, informal or holistic. 2016 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80712 https://fabenz.org.nz/proceeding-from-fabenz-conference-2016/ unknown |
| spellingShingle | Crawford, Nicole Lisciandro, Joanne Jones, Angela Jaceglav, Megan McCall, Deanna Bunn, Rosalie Cameron, Helen Westacott, Marguerite Andersen, Sharon Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities |
| title | Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities |
| title_full | Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities |
| title_fullStr | Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities |
| title_full_unstemmed | Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities |
| title_short | Models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four Australian universities |
| title_sort | models of support for student wellbeing in enabling programs: comparisons, contrasts and commonalities at four australian universities |
| url | https://fabenz.org.nz/proceeding-from-fabenz-conference-2016/ http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/80712 |