Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines

Objective: The attraction, selection, and attrition model posits that individuals actively self‐select into vocational and educational environments based on their personality traits and values. The present study investigated whether pre‐existing empathy and psychopathic personality trait differences...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Litten, Verity, Roberts, Lynne, Ladyshewsky, Rick, Castell, Emily, Kane, Robert
Format: Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2019
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/76015
_version_ 1848763604337164288
author Litten, Verity
Roberts, Lynne
Ladyshewsky, Rick
Castell, Emily
Kane, Robert
author_facet Litten, Verity
Roberts, Lynne
Ladyshewsky, Rick
Castell, Emily
Kane, Robert
author_sort Litten, Verity
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: The attraction, selection, and attrition model posits that individuals actively self‐select into vocational and educational environments based on their personality traits and values. The present study investigated whether pre‐existing empathy and psychopathic personality trait differences in newly enrolled first year undergraduate students predicted selection into psychology and business vocational pathways respectively. Method: An online self‐report survey collected data on levels of psychopathic traits and empathy from 380 newly enrolled first year business and psychology undergraduate students to examine whether these pre‐existing personality traits could predict academic discipline attraction and selection. Results: Binary logistic regression analysis partially supported the proposed hypotheses. Cognitive empathy, gender, and social desirability scores were found to be significant predictors of student discipline, with females, those with higher cognitive empathy and lower social desirability scores more likely to be attracted and selected into a psychology rather than a business degree. Small to moderate effect size differences were observed, with psychology students reporting significantly higher cognitive empathy (d = 0.53) and lower interpersonal psychopathy (d = 0.27) than business students. Conclusions: Findings highlight specific personality trait differences present between newly enrolled business and psychology students and the importance of these pre‐existing differences in student vocational decision‐making. It is anticipated that findings may assist vocational and career counsellors in guiding prospective students in the direction of a vocational pathway that is best suited to their personality, as this is likely to result in increased student satisfaction and self‐esteem whilst reducing student attrition.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:06:06Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-76015
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:06:06Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley-Blackwell
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-760152020-07-22T05:47:24Z Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines Litten, Verity Roberts, Lynne Ladyshewsky, Rick Castell, Emily Kane, Robert Objective: The attraction, selection, and attrition model posits that individuals actively self‐select into vocational and educational environments based on their personality traits and values. The present study investigated whether pre‐existing empathy and psychopathic personality trait differences in newly enrolled first year undergraduate students predicted selection into psychology and business vocational pathways respectively. Method: An online self‐report survey collected data on levels of psychopathic traits and empathy from 380 newly enrolled first year business and psychology undergraduate students to examine whether these pre‐existing personality traits could predict academic discipline attraction and selection. Results: Binary logistic regression analysis partially supported the proposed hypotheses. Cognitive empathy, gender, and social desirability scores were found to be significant predictors of student discipline, with females, those with higher cognitive empathy and lower social desirability scores more likely to be attracted and selected into a psychology rather than a business degree. Small to moderate effect size differences were observed, with psychology students reporting significantly higher cognitive empathy (d = 0.53) and lower interpersonal psychopathy (d = 0.27) than business students. Conclusions: Findings highlight specific personality trait differences present between newly enrolled business and psychology students and the importance of these pre‐existing differences in student vocational decision‐making. It is anticipated that findings may assist vocational and career counsellors in guiding prospective students in the direction of a vocational pathway that is best suited to their personality, as this is likely to result in increased student satisfaction and self‐esteem whilst reducing student attrition. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/76015 10.1111/ajpy.12263 Wiley-Blackwell restricted
spellingShingle Litten, Verity
Roberts, Lynne
Ladyshewsky, Rick
Castell, Emily
Kane, Robert
Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines
title Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines
title_full Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines
title_fullStr Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines
title_full_unstemmed Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines
title_short Empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines
title_sort empathy and psychopathic traits as predictors of selection into business or psychology disciplines
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/76015