A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures

The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, coun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Holtrop, Djurre, Born, M., de Vries, A., de Vries, R.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Pergamon Press 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74522
_version_ 1848763298315501568
author Holtrop, Djurre
Born, M.
de Vries, A.
de Vries, R.
author_facet Holtrop, Djurre
Born, M.
de Vries, A.
de Vries, R.
author_sort Holtrop, Djurre
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. To this end the HEXACO-PI-R (n = 215) and the MPT-BS (n = 316) were filled out by students in a within-subject design. Results showed a significant increase in criterion validity from generic, to tagged, to completely contextualized personality scales. Face validity and perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. The current study indicates that completely contextualizing personality items increases criterion validity more than just adding a tag to items.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:01:14Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-74522
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:01:14Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Pergamon Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-745222019-07-12T06:02:17Z A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures Holtrop, Djurre Born, M. de Vries, A. de Vries, R. The present study compared the effect of two types of Frame-of-Reference modifications to each other and to a baseline generic measure. Generic personality scales, tagged scales with 'at school', and completely modified scales were compared in their prediction of academic performance, counterproductive academic behavior, and participant reactions. To this end the HEXACO-PI-R (n = 215) and the MPT-BS (n = 316) were filled out by students in a within-subject design. Results showed a significant increase in criterion validity from generic, to tagged, to completely contextualized personality scales. Face validity and perceived predictive validity improved with increasing contextualization. The current study indicates that completely contextualizing personality items increases criterion validity more than just adding a tag to items. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74522 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.029 Pergamon Press restricted
spellingShingle Holtrop, Djurre
Born, M.
de Vries, A.
de Vries, R.
A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
title A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
title_full A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
title_fullStr A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
title_full_unstemmed A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
title_short A matter of context: A comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
title_sort matter of context: a comparison of two types of contextualized personality measures
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74522