Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task

A virtual shopping task was employed to illuminate why women who intend to shop healthily are differentially successful in doing so. Female undergraduates (N = 68) performed a modified approach and avoidance task that employed food items differing in healthiness and tastiness, and yielded relative s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mergelsberg, E., MacLeod, C., Mullan, Barbara, Rudaizky, D., Allom, Vanessa, Houben, K., Lipp, Ottmar
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV 2019
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74384
_version_ 1848763259755167744
author Mergelsberg, E.
MacLeod, C.
Mullan, Barbara
Rudaizky, D.
Allom, Vanessa
Houben, K.
Lipp, Ottmar
author_facet Mergelsberg, E.
MacLeod, C.
Mullan, Barbara
Rudaizky, D.
Allom, Vanessa
Houben, K.
Lipp, Ottmar
author_sort Mergelsberg, E.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description A virtual shopping task was employed to illuminate why women who intend to shop healthily are differentially successful in doing so. Female undergraduates (N = 68) performed a modified approach and avoidance task that employed food items differing in healthiness and tastiness, and yielded relative speed to select and reject food items in a stylised supermarket. Participants categorised a food item either in terms of healthiness or tastiness, then pulled (selected) or pushed (rejected) the item using a joystick. Participants showed faster selection of tasty food after categorisation in terms of tastiness, irrespective of the food's healthiness. However, after categorisation in terms of healthiness, only more successful healthy food shoppers showed faster selection of healthy items regardless of tastiness. Less successful healthy food shoppers showed this effect only for tasty food, and displayed faster rejection of food items not considered tasty, regardless of their assessed healthiness. Thus, when participants who reported the greatest gap between their shopping intention and shopping behaviour were judging the healthiness of food items, their speed to select and reject items continued to be influenced by tastiness. This suggests that reducing incidental processing of food tastiness may reduce the intention-behaviour gap in healthy food shopping.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T11:00:37Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-74384
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T11:00:37Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-743842020-12-03T06:18:26Z Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task Mergelsberg, E. MacLeod, C. Mullan, Barbara Rudaizky, D. Allom, Vanessa Houben, K. Lipp, Ottmar A virtual shopping task was employed to illuminate why women who intend to shop healthily are differentially successful in doing so. Female undergraduates (N = 68) performed a modified approach and avoidance task that employed food items differing in healthiness and tastiness, and yielded relative speed to select and reject food items in a stylised supermarket. Participants categorised a food item either in terms of healthiness or tastiness, then pulled (selected) or pushed (rejected) the item using a joystick. Participants showed faster selection of tasty food after categorisation in terms of tastiness, irrespective of the food's healthiness. However, after categorisation in terms of healthiness, only more successful healthy food shoppers showed faster selection of healthy items regardless of tastiness. Less successful healthy food shoppers showed this effect only for tasty food, and displayed faster rejection of food items not considered tasty, regardless of their assessed healthiness. Thus, when participants who reported the greatest gap between their shopping intention and shopping behaviour were judging the healthiness of food items, their speed to select and reject items continued to be influenced by tastiness. This suggests that reducing incidental processing of food tastiness may reduce the intention-behaviour gap in healthy food shopping. 2019 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74384 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.029 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Elsevier BV fulltext
spellingShingle Mergelsberg, E.
MacLeod, C.
Mullan, Barbara
Rudaizky, D.
Allom, Vanessa
Houben, K.
Lipp, Ottmar
Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task
title Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task
title_full Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task
title_fullStr Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task
title_full_unstemmed Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task
title_short Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task
title_sort food healthiness versus tastiness: contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/74384