A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development

The central role of teacher professional development in educational improvement is well-documented, and the investments of time and money into teacher professional development across the globe are immense. Given, however, that the quality of professional development has been shown to vary considerab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McChesney, K., Aldridge, Jill
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200285
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/67955
_version_ 1848761702640779264
author McChesney, K.
Aldridge, Jill
author_facet McChesney, K.
Aldridge, Jill
author_sort McChesney, K.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The central role of teacher professional development in educational improvement is well-documented, and the investments of time and money into teacher professional development across the globe are immense. Given, however, that the quality of professional development has been shown to vary considerably, meaningful evaluation of professional development activities is critical and has been widely advocated by both researchers and education system leaders. Whereas past reviews have examined the nature and quality of researcher-led evaluations of professional development, the present review focuses on the nature and quality of practitioner-led evaluations. Using current theoretical recommendations for effective evaluation as benchmarks, the review examines the degree to which these recommendations are reflected in routine school-based evaluation of professional development, finding that a significant gap persists between theory and practice. The review also identifies practical and psychological factors that restrict further improvement in practitioner-led evaluation and proposes ways in which researchers, practitioners and policymakers could each contribute to future improvement in practitioner-led evaluation of professional development. Given that much teacher professional development occurs within school settings and/or is managed by school staff, improving the quality of routine practitioner-led evaluation of that professional development is a potentially powerful driver for positive change.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:35:52Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-67955
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:35:52Z
publishDate 2018
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-679552021-05-11T05:24:55Z A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development McChesney, K. Aldridge, Jill The central role of teacher professional development in educational improvement is well-documented, and the investments of time and money into teacher professional development across the globe are immense. Given, however, that the quality of professional development has been shown to vary considerably, meaningful evaluation of professional development activities is critical and has been widely advocated by both researchers and education system leaders. Whereas past reviews have examined the nature and quality of researcher-led evaluations of professional development, the present review focuses on the nature and quality of practitioner-led evaluations. Using current theoretical recommendations for effective evaluation as benchmarks, the review examines the degree to which these recommendations are reflected in routine school-based evaluation of professional development, finding that a significant gap persists between theory and practice. The review also identifies practical and psychological factors that restrict further improvement in practitioner-led evaluation and proposes ways in which researchers, practitioners and policymakers could each contribute to future improvement in practitioner-led evaluation of professional development. Given that much teacher professional development occurs within school settings and/or is managed by school staff, improving the quality of routine practitioner-led evaluation of that professional development is a potentially powerful driver for positive change. 2018 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/67955 10.1080/19415257.2018.1452782 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200285 fulltext
spellingShingle McChesney, K.
Aldridge, Jill
A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development
title A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development
title_full A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development
title_fullStr A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development
title_full_unstemmed A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development
title_short A review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development
title_sort review of practitioner-led evaluation of teacher professional development
url http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200285
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/67955