The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?

© 2017, AATE - Australian Association Teaching English. All rights reserved. This essay expresses a profoundly ambivalent response to the legacy of Dartmouth, particularly Dixon’s ‘Growth’ Model of English. English educators owe a debt to Dixon in terms of innovative pedagogical methods that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jones, Jo
Format: Journal Article
Published: AATE 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63069
_version_ 1848760986427719680
author Jones, Jo
author_facet Jones, Jo
author_sort Jones, Jo
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2017, AATE - Australian Association Teaching English. All rights reserved. This essay expresses a profoundly ambivalent response to the legacy of Dartmouth, particularly Dixon’s ‘Growth’ Model of English. English educators owe a debt to Dixon in terms of innovative pedagogical methods that are part of the daily shapes of tertiary and high school English classes, including the way drama and performance invoke excitement and engagement, and the advantages of energised spoken formats used to debate issues and discuss texts. On the other hand some of Dartmouth’s key conceptual and methodological tenets, as they have played out over the decades, have become counter-productive elements of English teaching in the twenty-first century. Here, a final-year tertiary teacher education course - ‘Teaching, Literature, Culture’ - is used to challenge the dimensions of the Growth Model as they manifest in the present time.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T10:24:29Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-63069
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T10:24:29Z
publishDate 2017
publisher AATE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-630692018-02-06T06:15:12Z The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers? Jones, Jo © 2017, AATE - Australian Association Teaching English. All rights reserved. This essay expresses a profoundly ambivalent response to the legacy of Dartmouth, particularly Dixon’s ‘Growth’ Model of English. English educators owe a debt to Dixon in terms of innovative pedagogical methods that are part of the daily shapes of tertiary and high school English classes, including the way drama and performance invoke excitement and engagement, and the advantages of energised spoken formats used to debate issues and discuss texts. On the other hand some of Dartmouth’s key conceptual and methodological tenets, as they have played out over the decades, have become counter-productive elements of English teaching in the twenty-first century. Here, a final-year tertiary teacher education course - ‘Teaching, Literature, Culture’ - is used to challenge the dimensions of the Growth Model as they manifest in the present time. 2017 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63069 AATE restricted
spellingShingle Jones, Jo
The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?
title The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?
title_full The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?
title_fullStr The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?
title_full_unstemmed The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?
title_short The ambivalent legacy of Dartmouth five decades on: What, now, should we teach the English teachers?
title_sort ambivalent legacy of dartmouth five decades on: what, now, should we teach the english teachers?
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/63069