Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort

Children who enter school with limited proficiency in the language of instruction face a range of challenges in negotiating this new context, yet limited data have been available to describe the early developmental outcomes of this subpopulation in the Australian context. The Australian Early Develo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goldfeld, S., O'Connor, M., Mithen, J., Sayers, M., Brinkman, Sally
Format: Journal Article
Published: Sage Publications Ltd. 2014
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45093
_version_ 1848757187138027520
author Goldfeld, S.
O'Connor, M.
Mithen, J.
Sayers, M.
Brinkman, Sally
author_facet Goldfeld, S.
O'Connor, M.
Mithen, J.
Sayers, M.
Brinkman, Sally
author_sort Goldfeld, S.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Children who enter school with limited proficiency in the language of instruction face a range of challenges in negotiating this new context, yet limited data have been available to describe the early developmental outcomes of this subpopulation in the Australian context. The Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) is a teacher-rated checklist that measures five important domains of child development: physical health and wellbeing, social competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive skills, and communication skills and general knowledge. In 2009, the AEDI was completed for 97.5% of Australian children in their first year of schooling (N = 261,147; M = 5 years, 7 months of age), providing a unique opportunity to explore the cross-sectional associations between language background, proficiency in English, and early developmental outcomes at the population-level. Logistic regression analyses revealed that, compared to their peers from English-speaking backgrounds, bilingual children who were not yet proficient in English had substantially higher odds of being in the “vulnerable” range (bottom 10th percentile) on the AEDI domains (OR = 2.88, p < .001, to OR = 7.49, p < .001), whereas English-proficient bilingual children had equal or slightly lower odds (OR = .84, p < .001, to OR = .97, ns). Future research with longitudinal data is now needed to establish causal pathways and explore long term outcomes.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:24:06Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-45093
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:24:06Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Sage Publications Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-450932017-09-13T14:17:04Z Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort Goldfeld, S. O'Connor, M. Mithen, J. Sayers, M. Brinkman, Sally Children who enter school with limited proficiency in the language of instruction face a range of challenges in negotiating this new context, yet limited data have been available to describe the early developmental outcomes of this subpopulation in the Australian context. The Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) is a teacher-rated checklist that measures five important domains of child development: physical health and wellbeing, social competence, emotional maturity, language and cognitive skills, and communication skills and general knowledge. In 2009, the AEDI was completed for 97.5% of Australian children in their first year of schooling (N = 261,147; M = 5 years, 7 months of age), providing a unique opportunity to explore the cross-sectional associations between language background, proficiency in English, and early developmental outcomes at the population-level. Logistic regression analyses revealed that, compared to their peers from English-speaking backgrounds, bilingual children who were not yet proficient in English had substantially higher odds of being in the “vulnerable” range (bottom 10th percentile) on the AEDI domains (OR = 2.88, p < .001, to OR = 7.49, p < .001), whereas English-proficient bilingual children had equal or slightly lower odds (OR = .84, p < .001, to OR = .97, ns). Future research with longitudinal data is now needed to establish causal pathways and explore long term outcomes. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45093 10.1177/0165025413505945 Sage Publications Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle Goldfeld, S.
O'Connor, M.
Mithen, J.
Sayers, M.
Brinkman, Sally
Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort
title Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort
title_full Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort
title_fullStr Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort
title_full_unstemmed Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort
title_short Early development of emerging and English-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an Australian population cohort
title_sort early development of emerging and english-proficient bilingual children at school entry in an australian population cohort
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45093