A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance

Purpose – The purpose of this paper it to report the findings of an empirical study into managers’ job performance. A new measure was developed from the literature to test and establish the multidimensional structure of managers’ contextual and task performance. Design/methodology/approach – Field r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hosie, Peter, Nankervis, Alan
Format: Journal Article
Published: Emerald 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44697
_version_ 1848757075985825792
author Hosie, Peter
Nankervis, Alan
author_facet Hosie, Peter
Nankervis, Alan
author_sort Hosie, Peter
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose – The purpose of this paper it to report the findings of an empirical study into managers’ job performance. A new measure was developed from the literature to test and establish the multidimensional structure of managers’ contextual and task performance. Design/methodology/approach – Field ratings by executives explicitly and simultaneously measured both managers’ contextual and task performance. A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to a variety of public and third sector managers from a range of private, public and third sector occupations residing in (Western) Australia. A purposive sample yielded a response rate of 32 percent. Factor analysis was used to determine the items that constitute executives’ perceptions of managers’ performance using downward appraisal (i.e. by the person to whom a manager reports). Findings – The construct “managers’ job performance” was found to be multidimensional; consisting of four distinct contextual factors (Following, Persisting, Helping, Endorsing) and a further four distinct task factors (Delegating, Monitoring, Technical, Influencing). Originality/value – Performance appraisals of managers represent new items and factors that more accurately reflect the nature of the broader roles undertaken by managers, including transformative and ethical leadership. Findings from this study assist in establishing the structure for the subsequent appraisal of managers’ contextual and task performance. Future researchers could test the applicability and replicability of this new instrument in more diverse industry contexts using confirmatory statistical analysis.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T09:22:20Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-44697
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T09:22:20Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Emerald
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-446972017-09-13T14:09:30Z A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance Hosie, Peter Nankervis, Alan Purpose – The purpose of this paper it to report the findings of an empirical study into managers’ job performance. A new measure was developed from the literature to test and establish the multidimensional structure of managers’ contextual and task performance. Design/methodology/approach – Field ratings by executives explicitly and simultaneously measured both managers’ contextual and task performance. A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to a variety of public and third sector managers from a range of private, public and third sector occupations residing in (Western) Australia. A purposive sample yielded a response rate of 32 percent. Factor analysis was used to determine the items that constitute executives’ perceptions of managers’ performance using downward appraisal (i.e. by the person to whom a manager reports). Findings – The construct “managers’ job performance” was found to be multidimensional; consisting of four distinct contextual factors (Following, Persisting, Helping, Endorsing) and a further four distinct task factors (Delegating, Monitoring, Technical, Influencing). Originality/value – Performance appraisals of managers represent new items and factors that more accurately reflect the nature of the broader roles undertaken by managers, including transformative and ethical leadership. Findings from this study assist in establishing the structure for the subsequent appraisal of managers’ contextual and task performance. Future researchers could test the applicability and replicability of this new instrument in more diverse industry contexts using confirmatory statistical analysis. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44697 10.1108/PR-02-2014-0038 Emerald fulltext
spellingShingle Hosie, Peter
Nankervis, Alan
A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance
title A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance
title_full A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance
title_fullStr A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance
title_full_unstemmed A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance
title_short A multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance
title_sort multidimensional measure of managers' contextual and task performance
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/44697