Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat

Conducted during the merger between two hospitals, this longitudinal study (N = 149) revealed that at both Time 1 (i.e., questionnaire completed 12 months prior to the merger) and Time 2 (completed 1 year after the merger had been implemented), employees from the low-status premerger organization ge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amiot, C., Terry, Deborah, McKimme, B.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Psychology Press 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37450
_version_ 1848755050923425792
author Amiot, C.
Terry, Deborah
McKimme, B.
author_facet Amiot, C.
Terry, Deborah
McKimme, B.
author_sort Amiot, C.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Conducted during the merger between two hospitals, this longitudinal study (N = 149) revealed that at both Time 1 (i.e., questionnaire completed 12 months prior to the merger) and Time 2 (completed 1 year after the merger had been implemented), employees from the low-status premerger organization generally reported lower adjustment to the merger. Whereas Time 2 identity threat predicted lower and decreased identification with the new merged organization and perceptions of a common in group identity, perceived similarities between the merging organizations at Time 2 predicted higher identification with the new merged organization and higher perceptions of a common in group identity.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:50:09Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-37450
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:50:09Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Psychology Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-374502017-09-13T13:38:15Z Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat Amiot, C. Terry, Deborah McKimme, B. Conducted during the merger between two hospitals, this longitudinal study (N = 149) revealed that at both Time 1 (i.e., questionnaire completed 12 months prior to the merger) and Time 2 (completed 1 year after the merger had been implemented), employees from the low-status premerger organization generally reported lower adjustment to the merger. Whereas Time 2 identity threat predicted lower and decreased identification with the new merged organization and perceptions of a common in group identity, perceived similarities between the merging organizations at Time 2 predicted higher identification with the new merged organization and higher perceptions of a common in group identity. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37450 10.1080/01973533.2012.712016 Psychology Press restricted
spellingShingle Amiot, C.
Terry, Deborah
McKimme, B.
Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat
title Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat
title_full Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat
title_fullStr Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat
title_full_unstemmed Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat
title_short Social Identity Change During an Intergroup Merger: The Role of Status, Similarity, and Identity Threat
title_sort social identity change during an intergroup merger: the role of status, similarity, and identity threat
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/37450