Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts

The aims of this study were to determine the underlying conceptual structure of the thermal concept evaluation (TCE) questionnaire, a pencil-and-paper instrument about everyday contexts of heat, temperature, and heat transfer, to investigate students’ conceptual understanding of thermal concepts in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chu, Hye-Eun, Treagust, David, Yeo, Shelley, Zadnik, Marjan
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31247
_version_ 1848753324541607936
author Chu, Hye-Eun
Treagust, David
Yeo, Shelley
Zadnik, Marjan
author_facet Chu, Hye-Eun
Treagust, David
Yeo, Shelley
Zadnik, Marjan
author_sort Chu, Hye-Eun
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The aims of this study were to determine the underlying conceptual structure of the thermal concept evaluation (TCE) questionnaire, a pencil-and-paper instrument about everyday contexts of heat, temperature, and heat transfer, to investigate students’ conceptual understanding of thermal concepts in everyday contexts across several school years and to analyse the variables—school year, science subjects currently being studied, and science subjects previously studied in thermal energy—that influence students’ thermal conceptual understanding. The TCE, which was administered to 515 Korean students from years 10–12, was developed in Australia, using students’ alternative conceptions derived from the research literature. The conceptual structure comprised four groups—heat transfer and temperature changes, boiling, heat conductivity and equilibrium, and freezing and melting—using 19 of the 26 items in the original questionnaire. Depending on the year group, 25–55% of students experienced difficulties in applying scientific concepts in everyday contexts. Years of schooling, science subjects currently studied and physics topics previously studied correlated with development of students’ conceptual understanding, especially in topics relating to heat transfer, temperature scales, specific heat capacity, homeostasis, and thermodynamics. Although students did improve their conceptual understandings in later years of schooling, they still had difficulties in relating the scientific concepts to their experiences in everyday contexts. The study illustrates the utility of using a pencil-and-paper questionnaire to identify students’ understanding of thermal concepts in everyday situations and provides a baseline for Korean students’ achievement in terms of physics in everyday contexts, one of the objectives of the Korean national curriculum reforms.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T08:22:42Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-31247
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T08:22:42Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-312472017-09-13T15:52:04Z Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts Chu, Hye-Eun Treagust, David Yeo, Shelley Zadnik, Marjan Alternative conceptions Conceptual understanding Thermal physics Everyday contexts The aims of this study were to determine the underlying conceptual structure of the thermal concept evaluation (TCE) questionnaire, a pencil-and-paper instrument about everyday contexts of heat, temperature, and heat transfer, to investigate students’ conceptual understanding of thermal concepts in everyday contexts across several school years and to analyse the variables—school year, science subjects currently being studied, and science subjects previously studied in thermal energy—that influence students’ thermal conceptual understanding. The TCE, which was administered to 515 Korean students from years 10–12, was developed in Australia, using students’ alternative conceptions derived from the research literature. The conceptual structure comprised four groups—heat transfer and temperature changes, boiling, heat conductivity and equilibrium, and freezing and melting—using 19 of the 26 items in the original questionnaire. Depending on the year group, 25–55% of students experienced difficulties in applying scientific concepts in everyday contexts. Years of schooling, science subjects currently studied and physics topics previously studied correlated with development of students’ conceptual understanding, especially in topics relating to heat transfer, temperature scales, specific heat capacity, homeostasis, and thermodynamics. Although students did improve their conceptual understandings in later years of schooling, they still had difficulties in relating the scientific concepts to their experiences in everyday contexts. The study illustrates the utility of using a pencil-and-paper questionnaire to identify students’ understanding of thermal concepts in everyday situations and provides a baseline for Korean students’ achievement in terms of physics in everyday contexts, one of the objectives of the Korean national curriculum reforms. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31247 10.1080/09500693.2012.657714 Routledge restricted
spellingShingle Alternative conceptions
Conceptual understanding
Thermal physics
Everyday contexts
Chu, Hye-Eun
Treagust, David
Yeo, Shelley
Zadnik, Marjan
Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts
title Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts
title_full Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts
title_fullStr Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts
title_short Evaluation of Students’ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts
title_sort evaluation of students’ understanding of thermal concepts in everyday contexts
topic Alternative conceptions
Conceptual understanding
Thermal physics
Everyday contexts
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/31247