The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life

Increasing demands on academic work have resulted in many academics working long hours and expressing dissatisfaction with their working life. These concerns have led to a number of faculties and universities adopting workload allocation models to improve satisfaction and better manage workloads. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vardi, Iris
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22731
_version_ 1848750952263188480
author Vardi, Iris
author_facet Vardi, Iris
author_sort Vardi, Iris
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Increasing demands on academic work have resulted in many academics working long hours and expressing dissatisfaction with their working life. These concerns have led to a number of faculties and universities adopting workload allocation models to improve satisfaction and better manage workloads. This paper reports on a study which examined the workload models in use across a large Australian university. Analysis revealed that the various models could be categorised into three types. The pros, cons and impacts of these three categories of model were compared from both a management and staff perspective. The study found that while models of all types can lay the foundation for equitable distribution of workload, some categories of model can have unintended consequences with negative effects on the work culture and hence staff satisfaction.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:45:00Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-22731
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:45:00Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-227312017-09-13T15:58:25Z The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life Vardi, Iris Academic workload Workload allocation Workload models Increasing demands on academic work have resulted in many academics working long hours and expressing dissatisfaction with their working life. These concerns have led to a number of faculties and universities adopting workload allocation models to improve satisfaction and better manage workloads. This paper reports on a study which examined the workload models in use across a large Australian university. Analysis revealed that the various models could be categorised into three types. The pros, cons and impacts of these three categories of model were compared from both a management and staff perspective. The study found that while models of all types can lay the foundation for equitable distribution of workload, some categories of model can have unintended consequences with negative effects on the work culture and hence staff satisfaction. 2009 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22731 10.1007/s10734-008-9159-8 Springer restricted
spellingShingle Academic workload
Workload allocation
Workload models
Vardi, Iris
The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life
title The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life
title_full The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life
title_fullStr The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life
title_full_unstemmed The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life
title_short The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life
title_sort impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life
topic Academic workload
Workload allocation
Workload models
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22731