Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation

Performance management and evaluation (PME) is a well-established element of any organizational system of human resource management. However, the research field for PME is dominated by a one-dimensional approach located within positivist ontology. This paper explores and compares this positivist app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McKenna, Stephen, Richardson, Julia, Manroop, L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://www.elsevier.com/
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22470
_version_ 1848750878924734464
author McKenna, Stephen
Richardson, Julia
Manroop, L.
author_facet McKenna, Stephen
Richardson, Julia
Manroop, L.
author_sort McKenna, Stephen
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Performance management and evaluation (PME) is a well-established element of any organizational system of human resource management. However, the research field for PME is dominated by a one-dimensional approach located within positivist ontology. This paper explores and compares this positivist approach to PME with approaches located in other paradigms, more specifically interpretivism and critical theory. The paper argues that paradigmatic diversity in the study of PME would contribute a multidimensional, more sophisticated and nuanced approach. While research on PME within interpretivist and critical paradigms has been conducted over many years it is largely ignored or rejected in North America where a focus on managerialist prescriptions drives the research agenda. This paper calls for innovation through paradigmatic diversity in PME research and scholarship rather than further, incremental development of prescriptive models.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:43:50Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-22470
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:43:50Z
publishDate 2011
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-224702017-09-13T13:53:05Z Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation McKenna, Stephen Richardson, Julia Manroop, L. Performance management and evaluation (PME) is a well-established element of any organizational system of human resource management. However, the research field for PME is dominated by a one-dimensional approach located within positivist ontology. This paper explores and compares this positivist approach to PME with approaches located in other paradigms, more specifically interpretivism and critical theory. The paper argues that paradigmatic diversity in the study of PME would contribute a multidimensional, more sophisticated and nuanced approach. While research on PME within interpretivist and critical paradigms has been conducted over many years it is largely ignored or rejected in North America where a focus on managerialist prescriptions drives the research agenda. This paper calls for innovation through paradigmatic diversity in PME research and scholarship rather than further, incremental development of prescriptive models. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22470 10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.002 http://www.elsevier.com/ restricted
spellingShingle McKenna, Stephen
Richardson, Julia
Manroop, L.
Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation
title Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation
title_full Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation
title_fullStr Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation
title_short Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation
title_sort alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation
url http://www.elsevier.com/
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22470