Evaluation of a process and proforma for making consistent decisions about the seriousness of plagiarism incidents
Procedures for responding consistently to plagiarism incidents are neither clear‐cut nor easily implemented and yet inequitable treatment is intrinsically unfair. Classifying the seriousness of a plagiarism incident is problematic and penalties recommended for a given incident can vary greatly. This...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Oxford
2007
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21047 |