First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism

This paper is a case study of first‐year science and engineering students’ understandings of plagiarism. Students were surveyed for their views on scenarios illustrating instances of plagiarism in the context of the academic work and assessment of science and engineering students. The aim was to exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yeo, Shelley
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2007
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/20465
_version_ 1848750312257486848
author Yeo, Shelley
author_facet Yeo, Shelley
author_sort Yeo, Shelley
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper is a case study of first‐year science and engineering students’ understandings of plagiarism. Students were surveyed for their views on scenarios illustrating instances of plagiarism in the context of the academic work and assessment of science and engineering students. The aim was to explore their understandings of plagiarism and their judgement about the seriousness of each incident, and to shed light on the decisions they might make in response to such situations. The data indicated that although students could provide sound definitions of plagiarism, they did not always appreciate the scope of class‐based activity that constitutes plagiarism. Some examples of plagiarism were regarded as less serious than others, and in contradiction with the institution’s policy. Students also generally favoured more lenient penalties than provided for by policy. The purpose of the study was to ascertain first‐year students’ developmental needs in relation to academic honesty, plagiarism and appropriate acknowledgement of others’ work.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:34:50Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-20465
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:34:50Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-204652017-09-13T13:51:03Z First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism Yeo, Shelley This paper is a case study of first‐year science and engineering students’ understandings of plagiarism. Students were surveyed for their views on scenarios illustrating instances of plagiarism in the context of the academic work and assessment of science and engineering students. The aim was to explore their understandings of plagiarism and their judgement about the seriousness of each incident, and to shed light on the decisions they might make in response to such situations. The data indicated that although students could provide sound definitions of plagiarism, they did not always appreciate the scope of class‐based activity that constitutes plagiarism. Some examples of plagiarism were regarded as less serious than others, and in contradiction with the institution’s policy. Students also generally favoured more lenient penalties than provided for by policy. The purpose of the study was to ascertain first‐year students’ developmental needs in relation to academic honesty, plagiarism and appropriate acknowledgement of others’ work. 2007 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/20465 10.1080/07294360701310813 Routledge restricted
spellingShingle Yeo, Shelley
First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism
title First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism
title_full First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism
title_fullStr First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism
title_full_unstemmed First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism
title_short First year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism
title_sort first year university science and engineering students' understanding of plagiarism
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/20465