Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It?

In contrast to literacy and numeracy, graphicacy is under-explored. Yet it is not only linked to fundamental cognitive abilities, but is also important in all areas of instruction. This paper reports an analysis of the graphics that appear in K-12 science school books. The questions were the followi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Betrancourt, M., Ainsworth, S., De Vries, E., Boucheix, J., Lowe, Richard
Other Authors: Erica de Vries
Format: Conference Paper
Published: Universite Pierre-Mendes-France 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://earlisig2-2012.upmf-grenoble.fr/UserFiles/EARLI_SIG2_Proceedings_2012.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/17133
_version_ 1848749376866877440
author Betrancourt, M.
Ainsworth, S.
De Vries, E.
Boucheix, J.
Lowe, Richard
author2 Erica de Vries
author_facet Erica de Vries
Betrancourt, M.
Ainsworth, S.
De Vries, E.
Boucheix, J.
Lowe, Richard
author_sort Betrancourt, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In contrast to literacy and numeracy, graphicacy is under-explored. Yet it is not only linked to fundamental cognitive abilities, but is also important in all areas of instruction. This paper reports an analysis of the graphics that appear in K-12 science school books. The questions were the following: what skills might school students need to understand these graphics? Do books provide guidance or instructions to help students process these graphics? We found that many graphics required a high level of graphicacy, in terms of strategies and skills required to understand them. Moreover, strategic guidance or instructional help were rarely provided.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:19:58Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-17133
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:19:58Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Universite Pierre-Mendes-France
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-171332023-02-02T07:57:38Z Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It? Betrancourt, M. Ainsworth, S. De Vries, E. Boucheix, J. Lowe, Richard Erica de Vries Katharine Scheiter textbooks graphic representations graphicacy interpretative support In contrast to literacy and numeracy, graphicacy is under-explored. Yet it is not only linked to fundamental cognitive abilities, but is also important in all areas of instruction. This paper reports an analysis of the graphics that appear in K-12 science school books. The questions were the following: what skills might school students need to understand these graphics? Do books provide guidance or instructions to help students process these graphics? We found that many graphics required a high level of graphicacy, in terms of strategies and skills required to understand them. Moreover, strategic guidance or instructional help were rarely provided. 2012 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/17133 http://earlisig2-2012.upmf-grenoble.fr/UserFiles/EARLI_SIG2_Proceedings_2012.pdf Universite Pierre-Mendes-France restricted
spellingShingle textbooks
graphic representations
graphicacy
interpretative support
Betrancourt, M.
Ainsworth, S.
De Vries, E.
Boucheix, J.
Lowe, Richard
Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It?
title Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It?
title_full Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It?
title_fullStr Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It?
title_full_unstemmed Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It?
title_short Graphicacy: Do Readers of Science Textbooks Need It?
title_sort graphicacy: do readers of science textbooks need it?
topic textbooks
graphic representations
graphicacy
interpretative support
url http://earlisig2-2012.upmf-grenoble.fr/UserFiles/EARLI_SIG2_Proceedings_2012.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/17133