Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment

Purpose – Regulatory frameworks in Australia encourage employee participation in decision making (PDM) on the basis that participation benefits work effort, job satisfaction and commitment. Although the literature supports this premise, there is little evidence that patterns of causal inference in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott-Ladd, Brenda, Travaglione, Tony, Marshall, Verena
Format: Journal Article
Published: Emerald Group Publishing 2006
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15147
_version_ 1848748814659223552
author Scott-Ladd, Brenda
Travaglione, Tony
Marshall, Verena
author_facet Scott-Ladd, Brenda
Travaglione, Tony
Marshall, Verena
author_sort Scott-Ladd, Brenda
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose – Regulatory frameworks in Australia encourage employee participation in decision making (PDM) on the basis that participation benefits work effort, job satisfaction and commitment. Although the literature supports this premise, there is little evidence that patterns of causal inference in the relationship are clearly understood. This study aims to examine for structural and causal inference between PDM and the work environment over time. Design/methodology/approach – Structural equation modeling was used to examine longitudinal, matched sample data for causal inferences. Findings – The paper finds that participation in decision making appears to promote job satisfaction and commitment, whereas task variety and work effort foster participation.Research limitations/implications – The use of quantitative, self report data, small samples and cross industry data as well as possible overlap between commitment foci may limit the transferability of the findings. It is also important to note causality is merely inferred. Practical implications – Although participation in decision making positively influences work effort, autonomy and commitment, practitioners need to be mindful of keeping a balance between employee and employer needs. Job satisfaction and commitment are at risk in the long term if participation is viewed merely as a survival strategy for coping with work effort and task variety. Originality/value – The paper examines inferred causality within a participative decision-making framework and addresses the previously neglected need for multi-site and longitudinal studies.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:11:01Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-15147
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:11:01Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Emerald Group Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-151472017-09-13T15:55:51Z Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment Scott-Ladd, Brenda Travaglione, Tony Marshall, Verena Purpose – Regulatory frameworks in Australia encourage employee participation in decision making (PDM) on the basis that participation benefits work effort, job satisfaction and commitment. Although the literature supports this premise, there is little evidence that patterns of causal inference in the relationship are clearly understood. This study aims to examine for structural and causal inference between PDM and the work environment over time. Design/methodology/approach – Structural equation modeling was used to examine longitudinal, matched sample data for causal inferences. Findings – The paper finds that participation in decision making appears to promote job satisfaction and commitment, whereas task variety and work effort foster participation.Research limitations/implications – The use of quantitative, self report data, small samples and cross industry data as well as possible overlap between commitment foci may limit the transferability of the findings. It is also important to note causality is merely inferred. Practical implications – Although participation in decision making positively influences work effort, autonomy and commitment, practitioners need to be mindful of keeping a balance between employee and employer needs. Job satisfaction and commitment are at risk in the long term if participation is viewed merely as a survival strategy for coping with work effort and task variety. Originality/value – The paper examines inferred causality within a participative decision-making framework and addresses the previously neglected need for multi-site and longitudinal studies. 2006 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15147 10.1108/01437730610677990 Emerald Group Publishing fulltext
spellingShingle Scott-Ladd, Brenda
Travaglione, Tony
Marshall, Verena
Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment
title Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment
title_full Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment
title_fullStr Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment
title_full_unstemmed Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment
title_short Casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment
title_sort casual inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15147