Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the influence of social and personality factors on attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands and purchase intention between China Chinese and Taiwan Chinese consumers. Design/methodology/approach – Data collection was conducted using a mall intercept appr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teah, Min, Phau, Ian, Huang, Y.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10717
_version_ 1848747610015268864
author Teah, Min
Phau, Ian
Huang, Y.
author_facet Teah, Min
Phau, Ian
Huang, Y.
author_sort Teah, Min
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose – This paper aims to examine the influence of social and personality factors on attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands and purchase intention between China Chinese and Taiwan Chinese consumers. Design/methodology/approach – Data collection was conducted using a mall intercept approach in downtown Shanghai and Taipei. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and back-translated from English to Chinese and distributed. Structural equation modelling in LISREL was used to analyze the data. Findings – It was found that collectivism has a positive relationship with attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands for the China Chinese but not for the Taiwan Chinese. Personal gratification was found to have a negative relationship with attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands for the Taiwan Chinese consumers. Integrity and status consumption were found to have a positive relationship with attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands for both the China Chinese and Taiwan Chinese consumers. Research limitations/implications – The findings are limited to comparison between China Chinese from Shanghai and Taiwan Chinese from Taipei; therefore, the results may not be generalizable across all Chinese consumers or international consumers. In addition, only luxury brands were examined in this paper. Future studies would need to address other contexts or specific product categories. Practical implications – This paper presents findings from two Chinese cities. The consumers may be from the same region; however, it is found from the study that they pose different attitudes and purchase intentions towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Therefore, the insights from this paper provide a deeper understanding into the differences between Chinese consumers and implications for practitioners, academics and policy makers. Originality/value – Majority of the cross-national studies are often compared between the so-called Western or Eastern countries. This paper examined counterfeiting from China (which is deemed as one of the largest manufacturers of counterfeits) and Taiwan (which was one of the largest counterfeiters decades ago). This provides insights into the development and differences between regional consumers and their attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:51:53Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-10717
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:51:53Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-107172020-07-24T07:44:55Z Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities Teah, Min Phau, Ian Huang, Y. Attitudes Taiwan Consumers Counterfeiting China Luxury brands Purpose – This paper aims to examine the influence of social and personality factors on attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands and purchase intention between China Chinese and Taiwan Chinese consumers. Design/methodology/approach – Data collection was conducted using a mall intercept approach in downtown Shanghai and Taipei. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and back-translated from English to Chinese and distributed. Structural equation modelling in LISREL was used to analyze the data. Findings – It was found that collectivism has a positive relationship with attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands for the China Chinese but not for the Taiwan Chinese. Personal gratification was found to have a negative relationship with attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands for the Taiwan Chinese consumers. Integrity and status consumption were found to have a positive relationship with attitudes towards counterfeiting of luxury brands for both the China Chinese and Taiwan Chinese consumers. Research limitations/implications – The findings are limited to comparison between China Chinese from Shanghai and Taiwan Chinese from Taipei; therefore, the results may not be generalizable across all Chinese consumers or international consumers. In addition, only luxury brands were examined in this paper. Future studies would need to address other contexts or specific product categories. Practical implications – This paper presents findings from two Chinese cities. The consumers may be from the same region; however, it is found from the study that they pose different attitudes and purchase intentions towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Therefore, the insights from this paper provide a deeper understanding into the differences between Chinese consumers and implications for practitioners, academics and policy makers. Originality/value – Majority of the cross-national studies are often compared between the so-called Western or Eastern countries. This paper examined counterfeiting from China (which is deemed as one of the largest manufacturers of counterfeits) and Taiwan (which was one of the largest counterfeiters decades ago). This provides insights into the development and differences between regional consumers and their attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10717 10.1108/JCM-03-2014-0908 Emerald Group Publishing Limited fulltext
spellingShingle Attitudes
Taiwan
Consumers
Counterfeiting
China
Luxury brands
Teah, Min
Phau, Ian
Huang, Y.
Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities
title Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities
title_full Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities
title_fullStr Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities
title_full_unstemmed Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities
title_short Devil Continues to Wear “Counterfeit” Prada: A Tale of Two Cities
title_sort devil continues to wear “counterfeit” prada: a tale of two cities
topic Attitudes
Taiwan
Consumers
Counterfeiting
China
Luxury brands
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10717