The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI)

Background: Contemporary adolescents use e-mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e-mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the struc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conti-Ramsden, Gina, Durkin, K., Walker, A.
Format: Journal Article
Published: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10556
_version_ 1848747565219053568
author Conti-Ramsden, Gina
Durkin, K.
Walker, A.
author_facet Conti-Ramsden, Gina
Durkin, K.
Walker, A.
author_sort Conti-Ramsden, Gina
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Contemporary adolescents use e-mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e-mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e-mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Methods & Procedures: Thirty-eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e-mail reply to a standard e-mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e-mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e-mails were, how grammatically correct the e-mails were, and also the sender’s command of the English language. Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e-mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers. Conclusions& Implications: The findings suggest that the e-mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender’s language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:51:10Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-10556
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:51:10Z
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-105562017-09-13T14:55:05Z The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI) Conti-Ramsden, Gina Durkin, K. Walker, A. e-mail adolescents adolescent writing literacy skills specific language impairment (SLI) Background: Contemporary adolescents use e-mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e-mail by exceptional youth. Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e-mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Methods & Procedures: Thirty-eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e-mail reply to a standard e-mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e-mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e-mails were, how grammatically correct the e-mails were, and also the sender’s command of the English language. Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e-mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers. Conclusions& Implications: The findings suggest that the e-mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender’s language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10556 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00096.x John Wiley & Sons Ltd. restricted
spellingShingle e-mail
adolescents
adolescent writing
literacy skills
specific language impairment (SLI)
Conti-Ramsden, Gina
Durkin, K.
Walker, A.
The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI)
title The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI)
title_full The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI)
title_fullStr The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI)
title_full_unstemmed The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI)
title_short The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (SLI)
title_sort messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a historyof specific language impairment (sli)
topic e-mail
adolescents
adolescent writing
literacy skills
specific language impairment (SLI)
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10556