Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis

This study presents the steel fragility curves and performance curves of industrial buildings of different geometries. The fragility curves were obtained for different building geometries, and the performance curves were developed based on lateral load, which is affected by the geometry of the b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Nazri, Fadzli, Tahar, Syamimi, Saruddin, Siti Nur Aqilah, Shahidan, Shahiron
Format: Article
Published: EDP Sciences 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710302017
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710302017
http://eprints.usm.my/37200/1/(Seismic_Fragility_Curves_of_Industrial)_matecconf_iscee2017_02017.pdf
id usm-37200
recordtype eprints
spelling usm-372002017-10-19T02:42:01Z Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis Mohamed Nazri, Fadzli Tahar, Syamimi Saruddin, Siti Nur Aqilah Shahidan, Shahiron TA1-2040 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) This study presents the steel fragility curves and performance curves of industrial buildings of different geometries. The fragility curves were obtained for different building geometries, and the performance curves were developed based on lateral load, which is affected by the geometry of the building. Three records of far-field ground motion were used for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA), and the design lateral loads for pushover analysis (POA). All designs were based on British Standard (BS 5950); however, Eurocode 8 was preferred for seismic consideration in the analysis because BS 5950 does not specify any seismic provision. The five levels of performance stated by FEMA-273, namely, operational phase, immediate occupancy, damage control, life safety, and collapse prevention (CP) were used as main guidelines for evaluating structural performance. For POA, Model 2 had highest base shear, followed by Model 1 and Model 3, even though Model 2 has a smaller structure compared with Model 3. Meanwhile, the fragility curves showed that the probability of reaching or exceeding the CP level of Model 2 is the highest, followed by that of Models 1 and 3. EDP Sciences 2017 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf http://eprints.usm.my/37200/1/(Seismic_Fragility_Curves_of_Industrial)_matecconf_iscee2017_02017.pdf https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710302017 Mohamed Nazri, Fadzli and Tahar, Syamimi and Saruddin, Siti Nur Aqilah and Shahidan, Shahiron (2017) Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis. MATEC Web of Conferences, 103 (02017). pp. 1-8. ISSN 2261-236X http://eprints.usm.my/37200/
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
Universiti Sains Malaysia
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
building USM Repository
collection Online Access
topic TA1-2040 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA1-2040 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Mohamed Nazri, Fadzli
Tahar, Syamimi
Saruddin, Siti Nur Aqilah
Shahidan, Shahiron
Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis
description This study presents the steel fragility curves and performance curves of industrial buildings of different geometries. The fragility curves were obtained for different building geometries, and the performance curves were developed based on lateral load, which is affected by the geometry of the building. Three records of far-field ground motion were used for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA), and the design lateral loads for pushover analysis (POA). All designs were based on British Standard (BS 5950); however, Eurocode 8 was preferred for seismic consideration in the analysis because BS 5950 does not specify any seismic provision. The five levels of performance stated by FEMA-273, namely, operational phase, immediate occupancy, damage control, life safety, and collapse prevention (CP) were used as main guidelines for evaluating structural performance. For POA, Model 2 had highest base shear, followed by Model 1 and Model 3, even though Model 2 has a smaller structure compared with Model 3. Meanwhile, the fragility curves showed that the probability of reaching or exceeding the CP level of Model 2 is the highest, followed by that of Models 1 and 3.
format Article
author Mohamed Nazri, Fadzli
Tahar, Syamimi
Saruddin, Siti Nur Aqilah
Shahidan, Shahiron
author_facet Mohamed Nazri, Fadzli
Tahar, Syamimi
Saruddin, Siti Nur Aqilah
Shahidan, Shahiron
author_sort Mohamed Nazri, Fadzli
title Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis
title_short Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis
title_full Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis
title_fullStr Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Seismic Fragility Curves of Industrial Buildings by Using Nonlinear Analysis
title_sort seismic fragility curves of industrial buildings by using nonlinear analysis
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710302017
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710302017
http://eprints.usm.my/37200/1/(Seismic_Fragility_Curves_of_Industrial)_matecconf_iscee2017_02017.pdf
first_indexed 2018-09-08T09:17:25Z
last_indexed 2018-09-08T09:17:25Z
_version_ 1611030327256416256