Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the supervisory relationship and contextual supervision factors on the supervision outcomes among trainee counsellors. Respondents were 120 trainee counsellors and 18 supervisors from four public universities in Malaysia. Eight instrument...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	N. Wan Jaafar, Ghazali, wan, marzuki, Anuar,, A.
Format:	Conference or Workshop Item
Language:	English
Published:	2017
Subjects:	HM Sociology
Online Access:	http://ir.unimas.my/18999/ http://ir.unimas.my/18999/ http://ir.unimas.my/18999/1/Supervision%20outcomes%20as%20predictor%20to%20the%20supervisory%20relationship%20and%20supervision%20contextual%20factors_Scopus%2005012017%20%28abstrak%29.pdf

id	unimas-18999
recordtype	eprints
spelling	unimas-189992017-12-21T09:12:25Z http://ir.unimas.my/18999/ Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors N. Wan Jaafar, Ghazali, wan, marzuki Anuar,, A. HM Sociology The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the supervisory relationship and contextual supervision factors on the supervision outcomes among trainee counsellors. Respondents were 120 trainee counsellors and 18 supervisors from four public universities in Malaysia. Eight instruments were used in measuring the variables. The Supervisory Working Alliance Trainee Inventory (SWAI-T) measures the supervisory working alliance among trainee counsellors and the Role Conflict Role Ambiguity Inventory (RCRAI) measures the role conflict among trainee counsellors. The Supervision Interaction Questionnaire – Supervisee and Supervisor Inventory (SIQ-S) measures the interaction between trainee counsellors and supervisor and the Counsellor Rating Form – Short (CRF-S) measures the characteristics of the supervisors in supervision. The Selective Theory Sorter (STS) inventory was used to measure the counselling orientations among the trainee counsellors and supervisors whereas the Multicultural Counselling Knowledge and Awareness Scale (MCKAS) measures the knowledge and awareness toward multicultural counselling among trainee counsellors. The Supervision Outcomes Survey (SOS) and Counsellor Performance Inventory (CPI) were used to measure the satisfaction and performance among trainee counsellors. Results have revealed that there was a significant correlation between the supervisory relationship (supervisees’ working alliance, supervisees’ role conflict, supervision interaction, supervisors’ attributes) and supervision outcomes, r (118) = .53; p < .05. Other factors that have contributed to the significant correlations of supervision outcomes were supervisees’ working alliance, supervisees’ role conflict, and supervisors’ attributes, r (120) =.55; p < .05; r (120) = .21; p < .05; and r (116) =.50; p < .05 respectively. However, the result has shown that there was no significant correlation between the supervision contextual factors (supervisees’ and supervisors’ counselling orientation and supervisees’ cultural knowledge and awareness) and supervision outcomes. Multiple Regression analyses reported that the supervisory relationship had an influence on the supervision outcomes, R2 = .28, F (1,105) = 40.2, p < .05. Meanwhile, the supervision contextual factors had no influence on the supervision outcomes. Based on the research findings, the model signified that the supervision process could bring out changes in the supervisees. Practically, the supervisees’ working alliance was a significant factor that has influenced the supervisees’ development. Therefore, the academic supervisor should consider the supervisees’ role conflict, supervision interaction, and supervisors’ attributes during supervision. It is recommended that the differences between supervision interaction of the supervisors and the supervisees to be examined in the future research. 2017 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/18999/1/Supervision%20outcomes%20as%20predictor%20to%20the%20supervisory%20relationship%20and%20supervision%20contextual%20factors_Scopus%2005012017%20%28abstrak%29.pdf N. Wan Jaafar, Ghazali, and wan, marzuki and Anuar,, A. (2017) Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors. In: 4th International Conference on the Roles of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Engineering 2017 (ICoHSE4), 24-26 February 2017, PARKROYAL Penang Resort, Batu Feringghi, Penang, Malaysia. https://submit.confbay.com/conf/icohse2017
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building	UNIMAS Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	HM Sociology
spellingShingle	HM Sociology N. Wan Jaafar, Ghazali, wan, marzuki Anuar,, A. Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors
description	The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the supervisory relationship and contextual supervision factors on the supervision outcomes among trainee counsellors. Respondents were 120 trainee counsellors and 18 supervisors from four public universities in Malaysia. Eight instruments were used in measuring the variables. The Supervisory Working Alliance Trainee Inventory (SWAI-T) measures the supervisory working alliance among trainee counsellors and the Role Conflict Role Ambiguity Inventory (RCRAI) measures the role conflict among trainee counsellors. The Supervision Interaction Questionnaire – Supervisee and Supervisor Inventory (SIQ-S) measures the interaction between trainee counsellors and supervisor and the Counsellor Rating Form – Short (CRF-S) measures the characteristics of the supervisors in supervision. The Selective Theory Sorter (STS) inventory was used to measure the counselling orientations among the trainee counsellors and supervisors whereas the Multicultural Counselling Knowledge and Awareness Scale (MCKAS) measures the knowledge and awareness toward multicultural counselling among trainee counsellors. The Supervision Outcomes Survey (SOS) and Counsellor Performance Inventory (CPI) were used to measure the satisfaction and performance among trainee counsellors. Results have revealed that there was a significant correlation between the supervisory relationship (supervisees’ working alliance, supervisees’ role conflict, supervision interaction, supervisors’ attributes) and supervision outcomes, r (118) = .53; p < .05. Other factors that have contributed to the significant correlations of supervision outcomes were supervisees’ working alliance, supervisees’ role conflict, and supervisors’ attributes, r (120) =.55; p < .05; r (120) = .21; p < .05; and r (116) =.50; p < .05 respectively. However, the result has shown that there was no significant correlation between the supervision contextual factors (supervisees’ and supervisors’ counselling orientation and supervisees’ cultural knowledge and awareness) and supervision outcomes. Multiple Regression analyses reported that the supervisory relationship had an influence on the supervision outcomes, R2 = .28, F (1,105) = 40.2, p < .05. Meanwhile, the supervision contextual factors had no influence on the supervision outcomes. Based on the research findings, the model signified that the supervision process could bring out changes in the supervisees. Practically, the supervisees’ working alliance was a significant factor that has influenced the supervisees’ development. Therefore, the academic supervisor should consider the supervisees’ role conflict, supervision interaction, and supervisors’ attributes during supervision. It is recommended that the differences between supervision interaction of the supervisors and the supervisees to be examined in the future research.
format	Conference or Workshop Item
author	N. Wan Jaafar, Ghazali, wan, marzuki Anuar,, A.
author_facet	N. Wan Jaafar, Ghazali, wan, marzuki Anuar,, A.
author_sort	N. Wan Jaafar, Ghazali,
title	Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors
title_short	Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors
title_full	Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors
title_fullStr	Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors
title_full_unstemmed	Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors
title_sort	supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: study on the internship trainee counsellors
publishDate	2017
url	http://ir.unimas.my/18999/ http://ir.unimas.my/18999/ http://ir.unimas.my/18999/1/Supervision%20outcomes%20as%20predictor%20to%20the%20supervisory%20relationship%20and%20supervision%20contextual%20factors_Scopus%2005012017%20%28abstrak%29.pdf
first_indexed	2018-09-06T16:47:13Z
last_indexed	2018-09-06T16:47:13Z
_version_	1610877431952965632

Supervision outcomes as predictor to the supervisory relationship and supervision contextual factors: Study on the internship trainee counsellors

Similar Items