Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically

There have recently been various empirical attempts to answer Molyneux’s question, for example, the experiments undertaken by the Held group. These studies, though intricate, have encountered some objections, for instance, from Schwenkler, who proposes two ways of improving the experiments. One is “...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheng, Tony
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2015
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934651/
id pubmed-4934651
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-49346512016-07-18 Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically Cheng, Tony Journal Club There have recently been various empirical attempts to answer Molyneux’s question, for example, the experiments undertaken by the Held group. These studies, though intricate, have encountered some objections, for instance, from Schwenkler, who proposes two ways of improving the experiments. One is “to re-run [the] experiment with the stimulus objects made to move, and/or the subjects moved or permitted to move with respect to them” (p. 94), which would promote three dimensional or otherwise viewpoint-invariant representations. The other is “to use geometrically simpler shapes, such as the cube and sphere in Molyneux’s original proposal, or planar figures instead of three-dimensional solids” (p. 188). Connolly argues against the first modification but agrees with the second. In this article, I argue that the second modification is also problematic (though still surmountable), and that both Schwenkler and Connolly are too optimistic about the prospect of addressing Molyneux’s question empirically. SAGE Publications 2015-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4934651/ /pubmed/27433320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669515599330 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Cheng, Tony
spellingShingle Cheng, Tony
Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically
author_facet Cheng, Tony
author_sort Cheng, Tony
title Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically
title_short Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically
title_full Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically
title_fullStr Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically
title_full_unstemmed Obstacles to Testing Molyneux’s Question Empirically
title_sort obstacles to testing molyneux’s question empirically
description There have recently been various empirical attempts to answer Molyneux’s question, for example, the experiments undertaken by the Held group. These studies, though intricate, have encountered some objections, for instance, from Schwenkler, who proposes two ways of improving the experiments. One is “to re-run [the] experiment with the stimulus objects made to move, and/or the subjects moved or permitted to move with respect to them” (p. 94), which would promote three dimensional or otherwise viewpoint-invariant representations. The other is “to use geometrically simpler shapes, such as the cube and sphere in Molyneux’s original proposal, or planar figures instead of three-dimensional solids” (p. 188). Connolly argues against the first modification but agrees with the second. In this article, I argue that the second modification is also problematic (though still surmountable), and that both Schwenkler and Connolly are too optimistic about the prospect of addressing Molyneux’s question empirically.
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2015
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934651/
_version_ 1613605034032889856