Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age
Currently, there are two types of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in use for the detection of tuberculosis (TB) infection, the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (GFT-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB. Owing to contradictory reports regarding whether the results of these IGRAs are affected by the age of the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892501/ |
id |
pubmed-4892501 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
pubmed-48925012016-06-16 Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age Bae, Won Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young Kim, Se Joong Lee, Yeon Joo Park, Jong Sun Cho, Young-Jae Yoon, Ho Il Yim, Jae-Joon Lee, Choon-Taek Lee, Jae Ho Research Article Currently, there are two types of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in use for the detection of tuberculosis (TB) infection, the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (GFT-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB. Owing to contradictory reports regarding whether the results of these IGRAs are affected by the age of the patient, we aimed to determine if these two tests have age-related differences in sensitivity. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of diagnosed TB patients who were tested using either QFT-GIT or T-SPOT.TB from February 2008 to December 2013. The positivity of the two tests was analyzed and compared with true TB infection, which was defined as active TB based on either a positive Mycobacterium culture or a positive TB polymerase chain reaction. The QFT-GIT group included 192 TB patients, and the T-SPOT.TB group included 212 TB patients. Of the patients with pulmonary TB, 76 (39.6%) were in the QFT-GIT group and 143 (67.5%) in the T-SPOT.TB group. The overall sensitivity was 80.2% for QFT-GIT and 91.0% for T.SPOT.TB. The sensitivities of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB according to age group were as follows: <29 years, 93.3% and 96.7%; 30–49 years, 86.5% and 94.7%; 50–69 years, 76.8% and 87.5%; and >70 years, 68.3% and 85.7%, respectively. The trend of age-related changes in sensitivity was significant for both QFT-GIT (p = 0.004) and T.SPOT.TB (p = 0.039). However, only QFT-GIT was significantly related to age in the multivariate analysis. QFT-GIT, but not T-SPOT.TB, was significantly affected by patient age. Public Library of Science 2016-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4892501/ /pubmed/27258377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156917 Text en © 2016 Bae et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
repository_type |
Open Access Journal |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
US National Center for Biotechnology Information |
building |
NCBI PubMed |
collection |
Online Access |
language |
English |
format |
Online |
author |
Bae, Won Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young Kim, Se Joong Lee, Yeon Joo Park, Jong Sun Cho, Young-Jae Yoon, Ho Il Yim, Jae-Joon Lee, Choon-Taek Lee, Jae Ho |
spellingShingle |
Bae, Won Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young Kim, Se Joong Lee, Yeon Joo Park, Jong Sun Cho, Young-Jae Yoon, Ho Il Yim, Jae-Joon Lee, Choon-Taek Lee, Jae Ho Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age |
author_facet |
Bae, Won Park, Kyoung Un Song, Eun Young Kim, Se Joong Lee, Yeon Joo Park, Jong Sun Cho, Young-Jae Yoon, Ho Il Yim, Jae-Joon Lee, Choon-Taek Lee, Jae Ho |
author_sort |
Bae, Won |
title |
Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age |
title_short |
Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age |
title_full |
Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the Sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB According to Patient Age |
title_sort |
comparison of the sensitivity of quantiferon-tb gold in-tube and t-spot.tb according to patient age |
description |
Currently, there are two types of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in use for the detection of tuberculosis (TB) infection, the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (GFT-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB. Owing to contradictory reports regarding whether the results of these IGRAs are affected by the age of the patient, we aimed to determine if these two tests have age-related differences in sensitivity. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of diagnosed TB patients who were tested using either QFT-GIT or T-SPOT.TB from February 2008 to December 2013. The positivity of the two tests was analyzed and compared with true TB infection, which was defined as active TB based on either a positive Mycobacterium culture or a positive TB polymerase chain reaction. The QFT-GIT group included 192 TB patients, and the T-SPOT.TB group included 212 TB patients. Of the patients with pulmonary TB, 76 (39.6%) were in the QFT-GIT group and 143 (67.5%) in the T-SPOT.TB group. The overall sensitivity was 80.2% for QFT-GIT and 91.0% for T.SPOT.TB. The sensitivities of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB according to age group were as follows: <29 years, 93.3% and 96.7%; 30–49 years, 86.5% and 94.7%; 50–69 years, 76.8% and 87.5%; and >70 years, 68.3% and 85.7%, respectively. The trend of age-related changes in sensitivity was significant for both QFT-GIT (p = 0.004) and T.SPOT.TB (p = 0.039). However, only QFT-GIT was significantly related to age in the multivariate analysis. QFT-GIT, but not T-SPOT.TB, was significantly affected by patient age. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4892501/ |
_version_ |
1613588579766763520 |