Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials

Multi-arm multi-stage designs can improve the efficiency of the drug-development process by evaluating multiple experimental arms against a common control within one trial. This reduces the number of patients required compared to a series of trials testing each experimental arm separately against co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wason, James, Magirr, Dominic, Law, Martin, Jaki, Thomas
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2012
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4843088/
id pubmed-4843088
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-48430882016-05-24 Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials Wason, James Magirr, Dominic Law, Martin Jaki, Thomas Articles Multi-arm multi-stage designs can improve the efficiency of the drug-development process by evaluating multiple experimental arms against a common control within one trial. This reduces the number of patients required compared to a series of trials testing each experimental arm separately against control. By allowing for multiple stages experimental treatments can be eliminated early from the study if they are unlikely to be significantly better than control. Using the TAILoR trial as a motivating example, we explore a broad range of statistical issues related to multi-arm multi-stage trials including a comparison of different ways to power a multi-arm multi-stage trial; choosing the allocation ratio to the control group compared to other experimental arms; the consequences of adding additional experimental arms during a multi-arm multi-stage trial, and how one might control the type-I error rate when this is necessary; and modifying the stopping boundaries of a multi-arm multi-stage design to account for unknown variance in the treatment outcome. Multi-arm multi-stage trials represent a large financial investment, and so considering their design carefully is important to ensure efficiency and that they have a good chance of succeeding. SAGE Publications 2012-12-12 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4843088/ /pubmed/23242385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0962280212465498 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Wason, James
Magirr, Dominic
Law, Martin
Jaki, Thomas
spellingShingle Wason, James
Magirr, Dominic
Law, Martin
Jaki, Thomas
Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
author_facet Wason, James
Magirr, Dominic
Law, Martin
Jaki, Thomas
author_sort Wason, James
title Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
title_short Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
title_full Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
title_fullStr Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
title_full_unstemmed Some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
title_sort some recommendations for multi-arm multi-stage trials
description Multi-arm multi-stage designs can improve the efficiency of the drug-development process by evaluating multiple experimental arms against a common control within one trial. This reduces the number of patients required compared to a series of trials testing each experimental arm separately against control. By allowing for multiple stages experimental treatments can be eliminated early from the study if they are unlikely to be significantly better than control. Using the TAILoR trial as a motivating example, we explore a broad range of statistical issues related to multi-arm multi-stage trials including a comparison of different ways to power a multi-arm multi-stage trial; choosing the allocation ratio to the control group compared to other experimental arms; the consequences of adding additional experimental arms during a multi-arm multi-stage trial, and how one might control the type-I error rate when this is necessary; and modifying the stopping boundaries of a multi-arm multi-stage design to account for unknown variance in the treatment outcome. Multi-arm multi-stage trials represent a large financial investment, and so considering their design carefully is important to ensure efficiency and that they have a good chance of succeeding.
publisher SAGE Publications
publishDate 2012
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4843088/
_version_ 1613570299625734144