Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension

Most animals are faced with the challenge of securing food under the risk of predation. This frequently generates a trade-off whereby animals respond to predator cues with reduced movement to avoid predation at the direct cost of reduced foraging success. However, predators may also cause prey to be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siepielski, Adam M., Fallon, Eric, Boersma, Kate
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society Publishing 2016
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785975/
id pubmed-4785975
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-47859752016-03-18 Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension Siepielski, Adam M. Fallon, Eric Boersma, Kate Biology (Whole Organism) Most animals are faced with the challenge of securing food under the risk of predation. This frequently generates a trade-off whereby animals respond to predator cues with reduced movement to avoid predation at the direct cost of reduced foraging success. However, predators may also cause prey to be apprehensive in their foraging activities, which would generate an indirect ‘apprehension cost’. Apprehension arises when a forager redirects attention from foraging tasks to predator detection and incurs a cost from such multi-tasking, because the forager ends up making more mistakes in its foraging tasks as a result. Here, we test this apprehension cost hypothesis and show that damselflies miss a greater proportion of their prey during foraging bouts in response to both olfactory cues produced by conspecifics that have only viewed a fish predator and olfactory cues produced directly by fish. This reduced feeding efficiency is in addition to the stereotypical anti-predator response of reduced activity, which we also observed. These results show that costs associated with anti-predator responses not only arise through behavioural alterations that reduce the risk of predation, but also from the indirect costs of apprehension and multi-tasking that can reduce feeding efficiency under the threat of predation. The Royal Society Publishing 2016-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4785975/ /pubmed/26998324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150537 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Siepielski, Adam M.
Fallon, Eric
Boersma, Kate
spellingShingle Siepielski, Adam M.
Fallon, Eric
Boersma, Kate
Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension
author_facet Siepielski, Adam M.
Fallon, Eric
Boersma, Kate
author_sort Siepielski, Adam M.
title Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension
title_short Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension
title_full Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension
title_fullStr Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension
title_full_unstemmed Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension
title_sort predator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehension
description Most animals are faced with the challenge of securing food under the risk of predation. This frequently generates a trade-off whereby animals respond to predator cues with reduced movement to avoid predation at the direct cost of reduced foraging success. However, predators may also cause prey to be apprehensive in their foraging activities, which would generate an indirect ‘apprehension cost’. Apprehension arises when a forager redirects attention from foraging tasks to predator detection and incurs a cost from such multi-tasking, because the forager ends up making more mistakes in its foraging tasks as a result. Here, we test this apprehension cost hypothesis and show that damselflies miss a greater proportion of their prey during foraging bouts in response to both olfactory cues produced by conspecifics that have only viewed a fish predator and olfactory cues produced directly by fish. This reduced feeding efficiency is in addition to the stereotypical anti-predator response of reduced activity, which we also observed. These results show that costs associated with anti-predator responses not only arise through behavioural alterations that reduce the risk of predation, but also from the indirect costs of apprehension and multi-tasking that can reduce feeding efficiency under the threat of predation.
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
publishDate 2016
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4785975/
_version_ 1613550087929069568