Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response
Using examples of incidents that UK Police Forces deal with on a day-to-day basis, we explore the macrocognition of incident response. Central to our analysis is the idea that information relating to an incident is translated from negotiated to structured and actionable meaning, in terms of the Comm...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Online |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782162/ |
id |
pubmed-4782162 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
pubmed-47821622016-03-24 Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response Baber, Chris McMaster, Richard Psychology Using examples of incidents that UK Police Forces deal with on a day-to-day basis, we explore the macrocognition of incident response. Central to our analysis is the idea that information relating to an incident is translated from negotiated to structured and actionable meaning, in terms of the Community of Practice of the personnel involved in incident response. Through participant observation of, and interviews with, police personnel, we explore the manner in which these different types of meaning shift over the course of incident. In this way, macrocognition relates to gathering, framing, and sharing information through the collaborative sensemaking practices of those involved. This involves two cycles of macrocognition, which we see as ‘informal’ (driven by information gathering as the Community of Practice negotiates and actions meaning) and ‘formal’ (driven by the need to assign resources to the response and the need to record incident details). The examples illustrate that these cycles are often intertwined, as are the different forms of meaning, in situation-specific ways that provide adaptive response to the demands of the incident. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4782162/ /pubmed/27014117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00293 Text en Copyright © 2016 Baber and McMaster. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
repository_type |
Open Access Journal |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
US National Center for Biotechnology Information |
building |
NCBI PubMed |
collection |
Online Access |
language |
English |
format |
Online |
author |
Baber, Chris McMaster, Richard |
spellingShingle |
Baber, Chris McMaster, Richard Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response |
author_facet |
Baber, Chris McMaster, Richard |
author_sort |
Baber, Chris |
title |
Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response |
title_short |
Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response |
title_full |
Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response |
title_fullStr |
Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response |
title_full_unstemmed |
Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response |
title_sort |
macrocognition in day-to-day police incident response |
description |
Using examples of incidents that UK Police Forces deal with on a day-to-day basis, we explore the macrocognition of incident response. Central to our analysis is the idea that information relating to an incident is translated from negotiated to structured and actionable meaning, in terms of the Community of Practice of the personnel involved in incident response. Through participant observation of, and interviews with, police personnel, we explore the manner in which these different types of meaning shift over the course of incident. In this way, macrocognition relates to gathering, framing, and sharing information through the collaborative sensemaking practices of those involved. This involves two cycles of macrocognition, which we see as ‘informal’ (driven by information gathering as the Community of Practice negotiates and actions meaning) and ‘formal’ (driven by the need to assign resources to the response and the need to record incident details). The examples illustrate that these cycles are often intertwined, as are the different forms of meaning, in situation-specific ways that provide adaptive response to the demands of the incident. |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782162/ |
_version_ |
1613548615722074112 |