Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response

Using examples of incidents that UK Police Forces deal with on a day-to-day basis, we explore the macrocognition of incident response. Central to our analysis is the idea that information relating to an incident is translated from negotiated to structured and actionable meaning, in terms of the Comm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baber, Chris, McMaster, Richard
Format: Online
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782162/
id pubmed-4782162
recordtype oai_dc
spelling pubmed-47821622016-03-24 Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response Baber, Chris McMaster, Richard Psychology Using examples of incidents that UK Police Forces deal with on a day-to-day basis, we explore the macrocognition of incident response. Central to our analysis is the idea that information relating to an incident is translated from negotiated to structured and actionable meaning, in terms of the Community of Practice of the personnel involved in incident response. Through participant observation of, and interviews with, police personnel, we explore the manner in which these different types of meaning shift over the course of incident. In this way, macrocognition relates to gathering, framing, and sharing information through the collaborative sensemaking practices of those involved. This involves two cycles of macrocognition, which we see as ‘informal’ (driven by information gathering as the Community of Practice negotiates and actions meaning) and ‘formal’ (driven by the need to assign resources to the response and the need to record incident details). The examples illustrate that these cycles are often intertwined, as are the different forms of meaning, in situation-specific ways that provide adaptive response to the demands of the incident. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4782162/ /pubmed/27014117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00293 Text en Copyright © 2016 Baber and McMaster. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
repository_type Open Access Journal
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution US National Center for Biotechnology Information
building NCBI PubMed
collection Online Access
language English
format Online
author Baber, Chris
McMaster, Richard
spellingShingle Baber, Chris
McMaster, Richard
Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response
author_facet Baber, Chris
McMaster, Richard
author_sort Baber, Chris
title Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response
title_short Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response
title_full Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response
title_fullStr Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response
title_full_unstemmed Macrocognition in Day-To-Day Police Incident Response
title_sort macrocognition in day-to-day police incident response
description Using examples of incidents that UK Police Forces deal with on a day-to-day basis, we explore the macrocognition of incident response. Central to our analysis is the idea that information relating to an incident is translated from negotiated to structured and actionable meaning, in terms of the Community of Practice of the personnel involved in incident response. Through participant observation of, and interviews with, police personnel, we explore the manner in which these different types of meaning shift over the course of incident. In this way, macrocognition relates to gathering, framing, and sharing information through the collaborative sensemaking practices of those involved. This involves two cycles of macrocognition, which we see as ‘informal’ (driven by information gathering as the Community of Practice negotiates and actions meaning) and ‘formal’ (driven by the need to assign resources to the response and the need to record incident details). The examples illustrate that these cycles are often intertwined, as are the different forms of meaning, in situation-specific ways that provide adaptive response to the demands of the incident.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2016
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4782162/
_version_ 1613548615722074112